What height was reached by a projectile of a pressurized system (pics)

AI Thread Summary
A pressurized system operating at 500 psi experienced a valve failure, launching a 5,000 lbs valve through the roof. Calculating the height reached by the projectile requires more information, including aerodynamic drag, energy absorbed by the roof hole, and the momentum transfer from the expanding air. Estimating the time interval between the launch and landing could also provide a rough altitude estimate. The discussion highlights the complexity of such calculations, emphasizing the need for additional data. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately determining the projectile's height.
VanillaXtract
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There is a pressurized system at work that operates at 500 psi. The line is 22" in diameter. One of the valves failed at the body to bonnet connection and launched the valve (5,000 lbs) up and through the roof. I was curious if it is possible to calculate the height reached.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7711.jpg
    IMG_7711.jpg
    150.1 KB · Views: 160
  • 63896888579__C450825B-6E32-4A90-A4A8-1176F022619F.jpg
    63896888579__C450825B-6E32-4A90-A4A8-1176F022619F.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 163
Physics news on Phys.org
Whoa, seems like quite a blast! Hope everyone was ok! But with this information alone you cannot calculate the height, you need at least:
- the aerodynamic drag of the valve
- the amount of energy absorbed by the generation of the hole in the roof
- the amount of air(?) that has expanded from 500psi to atmospheric which was able to transfer its momentum to the valve.
 
Amazingly, I have witnessed a somewhat similar incident. Another way to address your question would be, do you have any estimate of the time interval between the initial launch and landing of the valve? You could get a rough idea of the altitude that way.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top