I believe you miss V50's point. You cannot just make the matter disappear, it would violatewhat we know about how the world behaves and the description we have of it. You then want to know what physics has to say about this situation, which is asking what physics says about a situation where it is not applicable.Strong Eagle said:I believe you miss the point.
If all matter in the universe suddenly disappeared, there would be no physical objects, including planets, stars, and even atoms. This would result in a complete void, leaving only dark energy and radiation behind.
Without matter, the concept of time and space as we know it would no longer exist. Time and space are relative to the existence of matter, so without matter, there would be no way to measure or perceive them.
It is highly unlikely that any form of life could exist without matter. Life, as we know it, is based on the interactions of atoms and molecules. Without matter, there would be no building blocks for life to exist.
The laws of physics are based on the interactions and properties of matter, so if all matter disappeared, the laws of physics would no longer be applicable. This would result in a complete breakdown of our understanding of the universe.
In theory, it is possible for all matter in the universe to disappear, but it would require a catastrophic event or a highly advanced technology that we currently do not possess. It is also important to note that the disappearance of all matter would have severe consequences and would likely result in the end of the universe as we know it.