What is a Clique in Graph Theory?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tenshou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "Clique" in graph theory, with participants seeking clarification on its definition, properties, and implications. The scope includes theoretical aspects of graph theory and mathematical reasoning related to cliques and their characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the definition of a clique, questioning whether it is simply a subgraph with at least two vertices or if it requires a minimum number of connected vertices.
  • Another participant defines a clique as a subset of vertices where every pair shares an edge, indicating that there is no size restriction and mentioning that the empty set and single-vertex sets are cliques, albeit uninteresting ones.
  • A participant suggests that a clique could be viewed as a maximally complete subgraph, which is affirmed by another participant who equates maximally complete subgraphs with maximal cliques.
  • There is a question about the relationship between the number of edges in a graph and the number of cliques, specifically whether a graph with five edges implies the existence of five 1-vertex cliques and one 5-vertex clique.
  • Another participant points out that a clique with n vertices must have n(n-1)/2 edges, indicating that no clique can have exactly five edges.
  • Discussion arises about the complete graph K5, with participants exploring the number of cliques of various sizes and the corresponding number of edges.
  • There is a clarification regarding the distinction between vertices and edges, with a participant explaining that a clique with n vertices has edges equal to the binomial coefficient n choose 2.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between triangle numbers and the number of edges in cliques, with one participant expressing confusion about the formulas involved.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the difference between combinations and permutations, with one participant acknowledging a misunderstanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations of the definition and properties of cliques, leading to some agreement on basic definitions but also significant confusion and differing views on specific mathematical relationships. The discussion remains unresolved on certain points, particularly regarding the implications of edge counts in relation to cliques.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of mathematical terms such as combinations versus permutations, as well as the specific conditions under which certain properties of cliques hold true. Some participants may be relying on different definitions or interpretations of cliques.

Tenshou
Messages
153
Reaction score
1
Okay, so I just started reading a few books on Graph Theory and Topology (I wasn't sure if I should put this in Topology or here.), and I am just here to clear up some concepts, mainly about Cliques, to be precise what is a Clique? I have read Wikipedia articles and the books, and still No clear conceptual answer I am able to form. So is a Clique, like a sub graph with at least 2 vertices, or is it a sub graph that has a minimum number of vertices that are connected via an edge are at least 2?

I am not sure If I just said the same thing twice or what D: see I am a little confused on this topic. The books I am reading are Graph Theory by Bondy and Murty, Modern Graph Theory Bollobas (his Erdos number is 2 >:3), Topology by Basener, and finally Discrete Mathematics and its Applications by Rosen. These books help with understanding some of the other technical stuff but this is Clique concept is kinda... kinda dry? you know what I mean? And since I am reading this, you better believe I am serious about this Graph Theory stuff :3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A clique is a subset of vertices of a graph such that any to elements share an edge. If we use write ab when a and b share an edge. Suppose we have a set of vertices V then a graph G which is a subset of VxV. If U is a subset of V it is a clique if UxU is a subset of G. I know of no size restriction. The empty set and any set of one element are cliques, though uninteresting ones. In short if for all x and y in U xy is in G, U is a clique.
 
So, like a maximally complete sub graph or something?
 
I guess you could say that. Any complete subgraph is a clique so maximally complete sub graph and maximal clique are equivalent.
 
oh okay thank you so much, also one more thing say there is a graph with 5 edges does that mean it has 5 1-vertex Cliques and 1 5-vertex Clique?
 
How many vertices? Remember since a clique is a complete subgraph if it has n vertices it must have n(n-1)/2 edges. No clique can have 5 edges as a clique has a triangle number of edges
0,1,3,6,10,15,...
 
so if we were to work with ##K_{5}## where it has a vertex sex of 5 elements ## \left(v_{1}, v_{2}, v_{3}, v_{4}, v_{5} \right)## then a clique is a sub vertex set such that it contains ##\left( ^{6} _{2}\right) ## vertices? n is that what you are getting at?
 
Are you mixing up vertices and edges?

A clique with n vertices has edges=n(n-1)/2=n choose 2=n \choose 2

Supposing your K5 is complete we have the following cliques
1 5-vertices cliques (10 edges)
5 4-vertices cliques ( 6 edges)
10 3-vertices cliques ( 3 edges)
10 2-vertices cliques ( 1 edges)
5 1-vertices cliques ( 1 edges)
1 0-vertices cliques ( 0 edges)

Kn if complete has cliques
n \choose k k-vertices cliques (k \choose 2 edges)

if we were to work with ##K_{n}## where it has a vertex sex of n elements ## \left(v_{1}, v_{2}, v_{3}, v_{4}, v_{5},... \right)## then a clique is a sub vertex set such that it contains k vertices and ##\left( ^{k} _{2}\right) ## eges
 
But ##\left( ^{n} _ {2}\right) = n^{2}-n## and triangle numbers are ##\left(^{n+1} _{2}\right)## but all of the rest of the stuff I seem to understand, so you are saying that the number of k-vertices are just the binomial formula, gotcha!
 
  • #10
{n \choose 2} =\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!)}=n(n-1)/2
 
Last edited:
  • #11
What do you mean? they don't really seem like they are the same.
 
  • #12
They are {n \choose 2} \, \mathop{and} \, {{n+1} \choose 2} they are the same numbers shifted by one.0,1,3,6,10,15,...
1,3,6,10,15,21,...
 
  • #13
But ## n^2-n \neq (n^2-n)/2## I still don't understand how they come from that.
 
  • #14
{n \choose 2} =\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!)}=n(n-1)/2
you have lost a 2

Just draw out a few small graphs it will become clear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #15
I see never mind, I was thinking of permutations, and not combinations D: thank you for you help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K