What Is a Composite Number With No Co-Prime Factors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ventrella
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Factors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying composite numbers that lack co-prime factors. Examples provided include 4, 8, 9, 16, and 25, which do not have any co-prime divisors, unlike numbers like 10, 6, and 12. The participant is exploring the significance of these numbers in relation to recursive tilings using Gaussian and Eisenstein integers. A suggestion to consider "prime power" numbers is made, leading to the idea of referencing sequence A246655 in the OEIS to refine the search. The conversation highlights a mathematical exploration of composite numbers and their properties in relation to fractals and power laws.
Ventrella
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
I have come across a question in my explorations of recursive tilings using Gaussian and Eisenstein Integers. It seems there might be a class of composite numbers which have no factors (divisors) that are co-prime. So, for instance: 10 is composite, but its factors (2 and 5) are co-prime. The same is true for 6 and 12. However, 4, 8, 9, 16, 25 do not have factors which are co-prime. (I am including composite numbers with only one factor in this list). These are then examples of the class of numbers I am looking to identify.

Without going into the details and reasoning for asking this question (unless it helps in finding the answer), I am initially curious if such a class of composites have been identified, and if so, perhaps there may be some significance that can shed some light on my problem.

Any insights, thoughts?

Thanks!
-Jeffrey
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks Stephen,

I think your suggestion is helping me to converge on the answer, although I clearly said that I am looking at composite numbers only. However I think that if I take the series pointed out (sequence A246655 in OEIS), and strip out all the primes, I will have the set I am looking for :)

My intuition tells me that this is right because fractals (as I am exploring them with tilings in lattices) obey power laws.

Thanks!
-j
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top