What is a nonconstant linear function?

[spoke]

arent linear functions always constant?

 

[espen180]

No, they aren't. Concider for example f(x)=x.

 

[Bacle2]

Actually, the only constant function that is linear is the 0 function.

If you have a linear map T:V-->W between V.Spaces (this generalizes to rings, etc.)

then, if T(v)==wo , i.e., T(v)=wo for all v in V, then:

T(v+v')=wo≠ T(v)+T(v')=wo+wo=2wo.

A similar argument applies to maps from a vector space to its base field.

 

[spoke]

No, they aren't. Concider for example f(x)=x.

well then i don't know what a constant and nonconstant linear functions are. Because f(x)=x is linear when graphed, so i was assuming linear is synonymous the word constant. as in a constant rate of change or constant slope.

 

[Office_Shredder]

A constant function is a function which always takes the same value, for example f(x)=2.
All linear functions on Rⁿcan be written as y=Ax where A is a matrix (in one dimension, just a number)

 

[Bacle2]

spoke:

You may be confusing constant rate of change, i.e., constant derivative--a property of linear functions-- with constant function.

 

[spoke]

A constant function is a function which always takes the same value, for example f(x)=2.
All linear functions on Rⁿcan be written as y=Ax where A is a matrix (in one dimension, just a number)

So would this relation be an example constant function? {(1,2), (2,2), (3,2), (4,2)}

 

[Bacle2]

Yes, exactly, that is what a constant function is like when seen as a subset of AxB.

Not to nitpick, but you may want to specify the sets A,B where you are defining

your function as a subset of AxB; here, A is clearly specified, but it is not clear

what B is (unless you assume your function is onto B).

 

[Dickfore]

A linear function is constant if and only if its slope is zero. By contaposition, a linear function is not constant (i.e. non-constant) iff its slope is different from zero.

 

[Bacle2]

Your right, Dickfore, but your example is that of a map from ℝ to itself may be too
specific for a general definition of function.

 

[Dickfore]

Your right, Dickfore, but your example is that of a map from ℝ to itself may be too
specific for a general definition of function.

OK, make
$$\mathbf{y}_{n \times 1} = \hat{A}_{n \times m} \cdot \mathbf{x}_{m \times 1} + \mathbf{b}_{n \times 1}$$
This is a general mapping from $\mathbb{C}^m \rightarrow \mathbb{C}^n$. But, now, the function may be constant in a more general case, when $\mathrm{rank}A \le m < n$.