What is a probability amplitude?

Carnot
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi

What is a probability amplitude - I have read the article on wikipedia and I still don't get it.
Hope someone out there can explain it to me..

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The probability amplitude is the solution of some equation, such as the wave equation. When it is squared (absolute value) it is interpreted as a probability. Don't try to look for a deeper meaning.
 
mathman said:
The probability amplitude is the solution of some equation, such as the wave equation. When it is squared (absolute value) it is interpreted as a probability. Don't try to look for a deeper meaning.
Would be a bit more accurate to say the probability amplitude function is a solution to the Schrodinger equation (the probability amplitude function is the system's "quantum state"), but this function gives a set of different probability amplitudes for different possible eigenstates of some observable quantity, like different position eigenstates. For each possible position (or set of positions for a collection of multiple particles), the function would assign a complex number (say, 2 + 3i) to that position(s) which would be the "probability amplitude" for that particular position(s). And if you make a position measurement, the square of the probability amplitude for any particular position eigenstate (really the complex conjugate of the probability amplitude, like [2 + 3i]*[2 - 3i]) gives the probability the particle (or collection of particles) will be found in that position(s). No one knows why you have to go through this arcane procedure of finding the time evolution of the probability amplitude and taking the complex conjugate at the moment of measurement to get the probabilities of different measurement results, it's just that this procedure seems to be the correct way to predict real-world probabilities.
 
That made it a bit clearer :-)

Thanks a lot both of you
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top