What is a useful way to talk about eigenstates of the position operator

dudemanguy333
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I've been having a specific major hang-up when it comes to understanding basic quantum mechanics, which is the position operator.

For the SHO, the time independent Schroedinger's equation looks like

<br /> E\psi = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}\psi + \frac{1}{2}mw^2\hat{x}^2\psi<br />

Except that usually it isn't written with \hat{x} but with x. What really showed me that I didn't understand this was an extra credit problem on an exam today, where

<br /> E\psi = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}\psi + \frac{1}{2}mw^2z^2\psi + az\sigma_z + b\sigma_z<br />

and to solve it we needed to show that H and \sigma_z commuted, then show some other business. But to treat z as a variable seemed incorrect, since to do that, we would need to be using a basis of its eigenstates. I also got confused when thinking about the collapse of observing position onto a single position, which would transform the wavefunction in x into a delta function. It seems, then, that delta functions are the eigenstates of our position operator, since an observation collapses our wave function into one. Then writing wave functions in the variable x would be turning that infinite-dimensional basis of delta functions into a different basis. Alternately, if we assume that we are in the state |x>, the quantum number for this state would be x, and so \hat{x}|x&gt;=x|x&gt;

Is any of this along a good line of though?



Also, the solutions to eigenstates of H for the SHO write the x operator as a sum of raising and lowering operators. I could probably find the eigenstates for x in terms of the SHO basis. Will the basis of x be the same for any problem, and will it then make \hat{p}=i\hbar\frac{d}{dx} the same when I am using this basis. What should I call this basis, function space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eigenstates are the quantum mechanical equivalent of the classical concept of eigenvalues. They are the basis of the spectral theorem and the interpretation of the quantum state as a superposition of eigenstates. The Born rule is an approximation to the more precise Dirac equation, and is the basis of the interpretation of the quantum state as a probability amplitude. The uncertainty principle is the quantum mechanical formalism of the Heisenberg principle of uncertainty, and is the basis of the interpretation of quantum systems as being intrinsically unpredictable.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top