How Do Elastic, Inelastic, and Explosion Collisions Differ?

AI Thread Summary
An elastic collision is characterized by the conservation of kinetic energy, meaning that the total energy of the colliding objects remains unchanged before and after the collision. In contrast, inelastic collisions result in energy loss due to factors such as friction and deformation, leading to a decrease in the total kinetic energy. A perfectly inelastic collision represents the extreme case where the maximum energy is lost, and the colliding objects stick together post-collision. An explosion collision can be viewed as a perfectly inelastic collision occurring in reverse, where energy is gained. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing different types of collisions in physics.
Jessibaca
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What is an elastic collion? I don't understand the difference between elastic, inelastic and explosion collisions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an elastic collision, no energy is lost. This means that the collective energy of the objects that collide, before the collision and after, is the same. In other collisions, energy is lost due to things like friction, deformation of the objects, sound, etc.
 
An explosion collision is a perfectly inelastic collision run in reverse. A perfectly inelastic collision represents the maximum amount of energy that can be lost (or gained, in this case) during the collision.

Elastic: No energy is lost by the colliding objects. Maximum boingy.

Inelastic: Energy is lost by the colliding objects.

Perfectly inelastic: The maximum amount of energy is lost by the colliding objects. Sticky.
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Elastic or inelastic collision?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Why is momentum conserved in elastic and inelastic collisions?
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Do Inelastic Collisions Distribute Energy Between Heat and Sound?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Real life elastic collision and variation of kinetic energy
Replies
3
Views
1K
How is it that momentum is being preserved in a non elastic collision?
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Elastic collision between two spheres
Replies
6
Views
2K
Elastic and inelastic collisions
Replies
10
Views
5K
Momentum Transfer: Elastic Collision vs Inelastic Collision
Replies
11
Views
4K
B Confused about force body diagram for 2 body collision
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Work Done/Energy Transferred in One Dimensional Collision
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top