What is an Initial Segment here?: Reidemeister-Schreier Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Initial Method
Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, everyone:

I am reading an article on the Reidemeister-Schreier
method for finding a presentation of a subgroup H of
a group G, given a presentation for G , in which this
statement is made:

A Schreier transversal of a subgroup H of F, free with
basis X, is a subset T of F such that for distinct
t in T, the cosets Ht are distinct, and the union of
the Ht is F, and such that ...

** every initial segment of an element of T itself
belongs to T **

Now, I understand that the cosets of H in G
partition G, and we select a subset T of G so that
Ht=/Ht' for t,t' in T, and \/Ht =G , but I have no
idea of what an initial segment would mean in this
context; are we assuming there is some sort of ordering
in T; maybe inherited from G ,or are we using
Well-Ordering Principle some how?

I thought we may have been considering the case where H
has infinite index in G, so that we assign a well-ordering in G
so that we can use Choice to select the least element g
representing the class Hg (i.e., all g_i in G with Hg_i=Hg ), but
I am not too clear on this.

Thanks for Any Ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume it is either simply a word in ##F(T)## or it refers to the enumeration process how to find a Schreier transversal by the Todd-Coxeter method. Cp. http://cocoa.dima.unige.it/conference/cocoa2013/posters/YvonneKaroske.pdf
I also found under "Fox calculus" an example where a differential operator ##F(T)\longrightarrow \mathbb{Z}(F(T))## was defined in a way that uses segments of words in ##F(T)##.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
441
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top