What is being Done in This proof of Limits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adelin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Proof
adelin
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to learn calculus by my own, but when it comes to proving limits I get very confuse.

Could somebody explain me what is being done here?

eq0054MP.gif


eq0060MP.gif


eq0061MP.gif


If you know any resources that could help me with this task let me know.

here is the source:
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/DefnOfLimit.aspx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first line is the statement you want to show.
The second line is a clever guess for delta (as function of epsilon), and the remaining steps are just simplifications, showing that |(5x-4)-6| is indeed < epsilon if |x-2|<delta.
 
adelin said:
I have been trying to learn calculus by my own, but when it comes to proving limits I get very confuse.

Could somebody explain me what is being done here?

eq0054MP.gif


eq0060MP.gif


eq0061MP.gif


If you know any resources that could help me with this task let me know.

here is the source:
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/DefnOfLimit.aspx

They're starting with this inequality:
##|(5x - 4) - 6| < \epsilon##
In a few algebra operations, they arrive at this:
##5|x - 2| < \epsilon ##
or
##|x - 2| < \epsilon/5 ##
If you let ##\delta = \epsilon/5##, then by reversing the steps above, you'll get back to the first inequality.

The whole idea is sort of a challenge-response. If you're trying to convince someone that ##\lim_{x \to 2}5x -4 = 6##, they might ask you get a function value within 0.1 (that's the ##\epsilon##). You say, take any x within 0.1/5 = 0.02 of 2.

If the challenger isn't satisfied, he might ask if you can get the function value within 0.001. You tell him to take any x within 0.0002 of 2 (i.e., between 1.9998 and 2.0002).

And so on. Eventually, he'll give up and accept that the limit is indeed 2.
 
Last edited:
Mark44 said:
They're starting with this inequality:
##|(5x - 4) - 6| < \epsilon##
In a few algebra operations, they arrive at this:
##5|x - 2| < \epsilon ##
or
##|x - 2| < \epsilon/5 ##
If you let ##\delta = \epsilon/5##, then by reversing the steps above, you'll get back to the first inequality.

The whole idea is sort of a challenge-response. If you're trying to convince someone that ##\lim_{x \to 2}5x -4 = 6##, they might ask you get a function value within 0.1 (that's the ##\epsilon##). You say, take any x within 0.1/5 = 0.02 of 2.

If the challenger isn't satisfied, he might ask if you can get the function value within 0.001. You tell him to take any x within 0.0002 of 2 (i.e., between 1.9998 and 2.0002).

And so on. Eventually, he'll give up and accept that the limit is indeed 2.
thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top