What is different between electrostatic voltage and circuit voltage?

Click For Summary
Electrostatic voltage and circuit voltage both represent the same physical phenomenon of electric potential, measured in volts as energy per unit charge. Electrostatic voltage is defined as the work done in moving a unit charge within an electric field, while circuit voltage can also be expressed through Ohm's Law (V=IR) under specific conditions. However, Ohm's Law applies only to Ohmic materials, and voltage can also be calculated using power and current (V=P/I). The key distinction lies in the context: electrostatic voltage pertains to static charges, while circuit voltage involves current flow and resistive elements. Ultimately, both concepts reflect the energy required to move charges, but they are applied in different scenarios.
okami11408
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm confused about this because voltage or potential difference is defined as work done by an external source in moving a unit charge from one point to another in an electric field.

However, in circuit analysis things seem to be different because we measure voltage from V=IR.

I want to know the different between these two methods. Or Is it the same thing?

Sorry for my English.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The physical quantity which has the units of 'Energy per unit Charge' is known as the electric (electrostatic) potential and and is measured in volts.

Now this definition can be shrunk to a point so you can have a defined 'voltage' at any point in space.

If you have two or more points you can define potential difference as the difference (also measured in voltage) of the electric potential between these two points.
This is the same idea as elevation (height) above the floor. The seat of your chair is at one height, the table at another, but both are measured in metres. The Height Difference between the chair and table is also measured in metres as in the voltage situation.

These points may be points in free space or points in a material or points at the ends of a component, say a resistor.

Notice I have only mentioned charge. If the charge is moving you have a current and can apply ohms or other laws. Obviously movment implies time so you have bring time into the equationa so current = charge per second.

So all voltages refer to the same physical phenomenon, but the circumstances are different so you require different equations.

Does this help?
 
It is the same concept. It is the minimum work you would have to do to move a unit charge through the resistor (even if the resistor didn't affect the charge at all).
 
hi okami11408! :smile:
okami11408 said:
… we measure voltage from V=IR.

not necessarily

V is not always equal to IR (that is true only if the material is "Ohmic")

V is always equal to power divided by current … P = VI
I'm confused about this because voltage or potential difference is defined as work done by an external source in moving a unit charge from one point to another in an electric field.

I want to know the different between these two methods. Or Is it the same thing?

from the pf library on voltage

Two ways of defining voltage:

voltage = energy/charge = work/charge = force"dot"distance/charge = (from the Lorentz force) electric field"dot"distance, or dV = E.dr

but also voltage = energy/charge = (energy/time)/(charge/time) = power/current, or V = P/I​
 
Voltage is always energy per charge. When a current flows through a resistor an electric field is created across that resistor. Just like when air flows through a small hole a pressure difference is created.
Well, actually it's the other way around, the electric field causes the current. And the stronger the electric field is, the higher the energy per charge and the higher the current that gets pushed through the resistor.
 
Thread 'I thought it was only Amazon that sold unsafe junk'
I grabbed an under cabinet LED light today at a big box store. Nothing special. 18 inches in length and made to plug several lights together. Here is a pic of the power cord: The drawing on the box led me to believe that it would accept a standard IEC cord which surprised me. But it's a variation of it. I didn't try it, but I would assume you could plug a standard IEC cord into this and have a double male cord AKA suicide cord. And to boot, it's likely going to reverse the hot and...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
903
Replies
9
Views
3K