What is Energy? - Unpacking Hard Definitions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definitions of energy, particularly the concepts of "vis viva" and "temporal displacement symmetry." Participants express confusion over the definitions, questioning their accuracy and implications, especially regarding the relationship between energy, momentum, and physical change in systems. Clarifications are provided, noting that "vis viva" refers to "living force" and that temporal displacement symmetry implies conservation of energy over time. The conversation highlights the complexity of energy definitions and the need for a deeper understanding of related physics concepts, such as Noether's theorem. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the intricate nature of defining energy in physical terms.
I Like Pi
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
What is Energy? - Hard energy definitions

Explain this definition: energy is the ability to impart vis viva (mv2) Is it a well definition?

Here's a more complex definition: energy is that measure of the physical change of a system that is conserved as a result of temporal displacement symmetry. Explain your interpretation of this definition

I'm a bit lost as to what these definitions mean :confused:

What is vis viva?


**I think that the what the second one means is that energy is the measure of the change of the system that is conserved as a result of time travel?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi I Like Pi! :smile:
I Like Pi said:
I'm a bit lost as to what these definitions mean :confused:

What is vis viva?

**I think that the what the second one means is that energy is the measure of the change of the system that is conserved as a result of time travel?

"vis" means force, and "vis viva" is "living force" (as opposed to "vis insita", which is "innate force", or inertia).

For some details, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_viva"

"temporal displacement symmetry" means that space-time, and physics generally, looks the same now as it did a thousand years ago and as it will tomorrow … a displacement in time makes no difference, so physics has time-displacement symmetry

(this is connected with Noether's theorem)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
Hi I Like Pi! :smile:"vis" means force, and "vis viva" is "living force" (as opposed to "vis insita", which is "innate force", or inertia).

For some details, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_viva"

"temporal displacement symmetry" means that space-time, and physics generally, looks the same now as it did a thousand years ago and as it will tomorrow … a displacement in time makes no difference, so physics has time-displacement symmetry

(this is connected with Noether's theorem)

Hey tiny-tim! :smile:

Thanks for the reply! so does the definition "energy is the ability to impart vis viva (mv2);" work? like what does it directly mean? I don't think the definition is right, though I'm not sure why :confused:

EDIT: wait, i think this is wrong because that would mean that energy is equivalent to momentum x speed. and momentum is derived from energy? :confused:

and for the second one? energy is that measure of the physical change of a system that is conserved as a result of temporal displacement symmetry. I don't seem to understand this... If the displacement in time doesn't make a difference, then how can there be a physical change of the system? Aw man, i think i confused myself... :redface:

Thanks tim, you're a lifesaver

EDIT: wait, if the space-time remains the same/temporal displacement symmetry... that means that that there is a conservation of energy, and the amount of energy yesterday is the same as today, and tomorrow, etc. this results into energy being the measure of the physical change of a system that is conserved.. <-- though i don't understand that last part :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I Like Pi said:
Hey tiny-tim! :smile:

Thanks for the reply! so does the definition "energy is the ability to impart vis viva (mv2);" work? and what does it directly mean? I don't think definition is right, though I'm not sure why :confused:

I dunno, I never did that sort of course.

Is this from a history-of-science course?

Anyway, those wikipedia articles should be some help. :smile:
and for the second one? energy is that measure of the physical change of a system that is conserved as a result of temporal displacement symmetry. I don't seem to understand this... If the displacement in time doesn't make a difference, then how can there be a physical change of the system? Aw man, i think i confused myself... :redface:

Thanks tim, you're a lifesaver

EDIT: wait, if the space-time remains the same/temporal displacement symmetry... that means that that there is a conservation of energy, and the amount of energy yesterday is the same as today, and tomorrow, etc. this results into energy being the measure of the physical change of a system that is conserved.. <-- though i don't understand that last part :confused:

Have you covered Noether's theorem in your course?
 
tiny-tim said:
I dunno, I never did that sort of course.

Is this from a history-of-science course?

Anyway, those wikipedia articles should be some help. :smile:


Have you covered Noether's theorem in your course?

No, it's a physics course, though we are studying implications and how real energy definitions are. And no, but I will check it out, maybe it'll help. Thanks so much! :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top