What is finite elasticity talking about?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fruitkiwi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elasticity Finite
AI Thread Summary
Finite elasticity refers to the theory of elastic materials that can undergo large deformations, distinguishing them from rigid bodies that do not deform. The discussion highlights the misconception that elasticity is only relevant for materials with finite lengths, clarifying that finite elasticity allows for significant deformations without losing the material's elastic properties. It emphasizes that while rigid bodies have infinite elastic coefficients and experience negligible deformation, finite elasticity enables a material to exhibit large deformations. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the differences between rigid bodies and materials with finite elasticity. Understanding this distinction is crucial in the study of solid mechanics and material behavior.
fruitkiwi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi, dear all,

recently study the solid mechanic continuity, keep reading about to solve large deformation of material, you will need so called "finite elasticity"

What is this finite elasticity refer to ?
"Finite elasticity is a theory of elastic materials capable of undergoing large deformations."

Erm, this sentence don't carry any meaning to me.
I thought elastic material should always be finite, as it has finite length, which allow us to have elasticity measurement. if i have large deformation, will it change anything about elasticity?or it refer to nonlinear elastic material?

mind to share?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone mind to share about this topic?
or my question is too general?
 
I think, "finite elasticity" in this context is simply used to distinguish from "rigid bodies", whose elastic coefficients are effectively infinite and deformations infinitesimal. Thus, a body exhibiting "finite elasticity" would be capable of "large deformations" that rigid body is not.
 
Hi, K^2.

thank you for your explanation.
It is solved

to support your statement, i find the following from wikipedia.
In physics, a rigid body is an idealization of a solid body of finite size in which deformation is neglected.

i never realize have such differences. thanks a lot
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top