What Is Meant by Backscattering Electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
Kit
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
what is meant by backscattering electrons? :confused:

i am confused by this and secondary electrons...

thx for answering :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kit said:
what is meant by backscattering electrons? :confused:

i am confused by this and secondary electrons...

thx for answering :biggrin:

The problem here is that you did not put your question in the context that you are seeing these things. Remember that in physics, certain things have different exact meanings in different areas.

If I based those on what I think they are, based on what I'm familiar with (secondary emission process, SEM, etc), then:

(i) backscattering electrons are the primary electrons that you detect that were "reflected" off the material, i.e. these are the same incident electrons - they simply bounced off the surface of the material and came back almost into the same direction the came from. One signature of these electrons is that they have the same energy as the primary.

(ii) secondary electrons are electrons that came from the material itself AFTER the absoption of the primary electron. So you shoot a bunch of primary electrons at a material, the primary get absorbed, and electrons came out. The secondary electrons may be MORE in number than the primary, depending on the energy of the primary electrons and the secondary emission yield (SEY) of the material. If a material has a SEY of 4 at a particular energy, then a primary electron hitting the material at that very same energy can cause the emission of 4 secondary electrons. Of course, these secondary electrons have energies way lower than the incident primary. This technique is most often used in SEM, Auger spectroscopy, etc.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top