What is meant by momentum is maximised?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxbye3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
maxbye3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm answering some questions to do with rockets and their momentum after 250s of engine time

t=250s
fuel rate of rocket= 480 kg/s
initial exhaust speed= 3.27 km/s
final velocity: 12.2 km/s
m (fuel at t=0) = 1.81*10^5 kg
m(total at t=0) = 2.55*10^5 kg
m (total at t=250s) = 68400 kg

associated questions have been pretty simple so far like:
find the final velocity
find the ration of masses if the final speed was ...


Homework Equations



I'm stumped on the meaning of the phase "momentum is maximised"
(not lookign for someone to do my homework)

the phrase I'm stumped on:
A rocket starts moving from rest in deep space. What fraction of its initial mass does the
rocket (i.e. casing plus payload plus remaining fuel) have when its "momentum is maximised"

what is the definition of maximised momentum? The larger the final velocity, the larger the momentum and this all depends on the feul rate from which the rocket uses (the amount of feul 480kg/s)
Anyway if anyone can understand what is meant by "momentum is maximised" that would be great.



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/2735/momentuum.jpg

Here is a graph of you problem. More exactly the momentuum of your rocket as a function of time. It has a maximum right there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks lok, I wasn't thinking at all.
I took dp/dm=0 to get maximum initial mass?
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top