A What is primordial non gaussianity?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Avi Nandi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Primordial non-Gaussianity refers to the non-Gaussian distribution observed in the temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). It highlights how temperature variations, which are sound waves, may exhibit correlations and distributions that deviate from a standard Gaussian distribution. This deviation complicates the analysis of CMB statistics, as Gaussian waves can be easily described using the two-point correlation function. Current inflation models suggest potential deviations from Gaussian behavior, but no evidence has yet been found to support this. Understanding primordial non-Gaussianity is crucial for advancing cosmological theories and analyzing the CMB's power spectrum.
Avi Nandi
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Can anyone give an idea about primordial non gaussianity in a popular way??
 
Space news on Phys.org
Where did you see this expression, or did you make it up?
 
Primordial non-Gaussianity is simply a term fo the non Guassian distribution detected in the temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background. One of the better known discussions of this phenomenon is probably https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1148, Detection of primordial non-Gaussianity (fNL) in the WMAP 3-year data at above 99.5% confidence.
 
Avi Nandi said:
Can anyone give an idea about primordial non gaussianity in a popular way??
The super short version is that it's all about the statistical properties of the temperature variations in the CMB.

Those temperature variations are sound waves, and at each frequency and direction of motion, if they are Gaussian, the amplitude of the resulting wave is drawn from an independent Gaussian distribution (also known as a Normal distribution). Deviations from this strict Gaussianity come in two ways:
1. The amplitudes of the waves can be correlated with one another.
2. The distribution of amplitudes differs from a Gaussian distribution (typically having fatter tails, meaning large deviations are more frequent than expected from a pure Gaussian).

The benefit of having Gaussian-distributed waves is that they can be perfectly-described by what is known as the two-point correlation function (which is the statistical variance between two points as a function of distance between the two points, independent of direction). This fact has a lot of really neat mathematical properties which make understanding the statistics of the CMB really easy. It means, for example, that all of the information about the temperature variation of the CMB is encoded in its power spectrum.

But what if this assumption isn't the case? Lots of more complex inflation models predict significant deviations from Gaussian behavior. These deviations can become far more challenging to investigate, just due to the more complex mathematics involved. So far, there is no evidence of deviation from Gaussianity:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01592
 
Thanks Chronos and Kimbyd.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top