What is the Absolute Value of b(t)?

frenzal_dude
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I need to find the absolute value of b(t):

b(t)=a(t)[1+e^{-j2\pi tT}]

Here is the answer in the textbook:
\therefore \left | b(t) \right |=\left | a(t) \right |\sqrt{2(1+cos(2\pi tT)}2|cos(\pi tT)|

However I got a different answer when working it out, and can't understand how they got to that result from the textbook.
Here is my working out:

<br /> b(t)=a(t) + a(t)e^{-j2\pi tT}=a(t)+a(t)[cos(2\pi tT) - jsin(2\pi tT)]=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)<br />
<br /> \therefore |b(t)|=|a(t)|+|a(t)cos(2\pi tT)|+|a(t)sin(2\pi tT)|<br />

Please let me know where I'm going wrong.
Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
frenzal_dude said:
I need to find the absolute value of b(t):

b(t)=a(t)[1+e^{-j2\pi tT}]

Here is the answer in the textbook:
\therefore \left | b(t) \right |=\left | a(t) \right |\sqrt{2(1+cos(2\pi tT)}2|cos(\pi tT)|

However I got a different answer when working it out, and can't understand how they got to that result from the textbook.
Here is my working out:

<br /> b(t)=a(t) + a(t)e^{-j2\pi tT}=a(t)+a(t)[cos(2\pi tT) - jsin(2\pi tT)]=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)<br />
<br /> \therefore |b(t)|=|a(t)|+|a(t)cos(2\pi tT)|+|a(t)sin(2\pi tT)|<br />

Please let me know where I'm going wrong.
Thanks.

You can't do that. It's not true that |a|=|b|+|c|... It's not true at all. You need to use the very definition of modulus:

|a+bi|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}
 
Thanks for the reply, I tried it with that formula, however I still don't get the same answer as the textbook. Here's my working out:

b(t)=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)

\therefore |b(t)|=\sqrt{[a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)]^{2}+[a(t)sin(2\pi tT)]^{2}}

=\sqrt{a^{2}(t)+2a(t)cos(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)cos^{2}(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)sin^{2}(2\pi tT)}

=\sqrt{a^{2}(t)[1+2\sqrt{a(t)}cos(2\pi tT) + cos^{2}(2\pi tT)+sin^{2}(2\pi tT)]}

=|a(t)|\sqrt{2+2\sqrt{a(t)}cos(2\pi tT)}

=|a(t)|\sqrt{2[1+\sqrt{a(t)}cos(2\pi tT)]}
 
frenzal_dude said:
Thanks for the reply, I tried it with that formula, however I still don't get the same answer as the textbook. Here's my working out:

b(t)=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)

\therefore |b(t)|=\sqrt{[a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)]^{2}+[a(t)sin(2\pi tT)]^{2}}

=\sqrt{a^{2}(t)+2a(t)cos(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)cos^{2}(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)sin^{2}(2\pi tT)}

That second term should have an a(t)^2.
 
Also cos^2(2\pi tT)+ sin^2(2\pi tT)= 1 so what you have reduces to
a(T)\sqrt{2(1+ cos(2\pi tT))}

By the way, this has nothing to do with your question but that "tT" looks very strange to me. If it were t/T, then your sin and cosine functions would have a period of T, which I would interpret as a period of time. The way you have it their period is 1/T. It strikes me as strange to all something with units of "1/time", T.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Also cos^2(2\pi tT)+ sin^2(2\pi tT)= 1 so what you have reduces to
a(T)\sqrt{2(1+ cos(2\pi tT))}

By the way, this has nothing to do with your question but that "tT" looks very strange to me. If it were t/T, then your sin and cosine functions would have a period of T, which I would interpret as a period of time. The way you have it their period is 1/T. It strikes me as strange to all something with units of "1/time", T.

You're completely right, the T there is actually frequency which is 1/T, I should have used a different letter other than T (which ofcourse usually means period).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top