What is the Absolute Value of b(t)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the absolute value of the function b(t) defined as b(t)=a(t)[1+e^{-j2\pi tT}]. The textbook provides the solution as |b(t)|=|a(t)|√{2(1+cos(2πtT))}, which the user struggles to derive. The user initially calculates |b(t)| incorrectly by adding the absolute values of its components instead of applying the modulus formula for complex numbers. After further attempts, they realize that the correct approach involves using the identity cos²(2πtT) + sin²(2πtT) = 1, leading to the simplified expression for |b(t)|. The user acknowledges a mistake in notation regarding the variable T, clarifying it represents frequency rather than period.
frenzal_dude
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I need to find the absolute value of b(t):

b(t)=a(t)[1+e^{-j2\pi tT}]

Here is the answer in the textbook:
\therefore \left | b(t) \right |=\left | a(t) \right |\sqrt{2(1+cos(2\pi tT)}2|cos(\pi tT)|

However I got a different answer when working it out, and can't understand how they got to that result from the textbook.
Here is my working out:

<br /> b(t)=a(t) + a(t)e^{-j2\pi tT}=a(t)+a(t)[cos(2\pi tT) - jsin(2\pi tT)]=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)<br />
<br /> \therefore |b(t)|=|a(t)|+|a(t)cos(2\pi tT)|+|a(t)sin(2\pi tT)|<br />

Please let me know where I'm going wrong.
Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
frenzal_dude said:
I need to find the absolute value of b(t):

b(t)=a(t)[1+e^{-j2\pi tT}]

Here is the answer in the textbook:
\therefore \left | b(t) \right |=\left | a(t) \right |\sqrt{2(1+cos(2\pi tT)}2|cos(\pi tT)|

However I got a different answer when working it out, and can't understand how they got to that result from the textbook.
Here is my working out:

<br /> b(t)=a(t) + a(t)e^{-j2\pi tT}=a(t)+a(t)[cos(2\pi tT) - jsin(2\pi tT)]=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)<br />
<br /> \therefore |b(t)|=|a(t)|+|a(t)cos(2\pi tT)|+|a(t)sin(2\pi tT)|<br />

Please let me know where I'm going wrong.
Thanks.

You can't do that. It's not true that |a|=|b|+|c|... It's not true at all. You need to use the very definition of modulus:

|a+bi|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}
 
Thanks for the reply, I tried it with that formula, however I still don't get the same answer as the textbook. Here's my working out:

b(t)=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)

\therefore |b(t)|=\sqrt{[a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)]^{2}+[a(t)sin(2\pi tT)]^{2}}

=\sqrt{a^{2}(t)+2a(t)cos(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)cos^{2}(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)sin^{2}(2\pi tT)}

=\sqrt{a^{2}(t)[1+2\sqrt{a(t)}cos(2\pi tT) + cos^{2}(2\pi tT)+sin^{2}(2\pi tT)]}

=|a(t)|\sqrt{2+2\sqrt{a(t)}cos(2\pi tT)}

=|a(t)|\sqrt{2[1+\sqrt{a(t)}cos(2\pi tT)]}
 
frenzal_dude said:
Thanks for the reply, I tried it with that formula, however I still don't get the same answer as the textbook. Here's my working out:

b(t)=a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)-a(t)jsin(2\pi tT)

\therefore |b(t)|=\sqrt{[a(t)+a(t)cos(2\pi tT)]^{2}+[a(t)sin(2\pi tT)]^{2}}

=\sqrt{a^{2}(t)+2a(t)cos(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)cos^{2}(2\pi tT)+a^{2}(t)sin^{2}(2\pi tT)}

That second term should have an a(t)^2.
 
Also cos^2(2\pi tT)+ sin^2(2\pi tT)= 1 so what you have reduces to
a(T)\sqrt{2(1+ cos(2\pi tT))}

By the way, this has nothing to do with your question but that "tT" looks very strange to me. If it were t/T, then your sin and cosine functions would have a period of T, which I would interpret as a period of time. The way you have it their period is 1/T. It strikes me as strange to all something with units of "1/time", T.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Also cos^2(2\pi tT)+ sin^2(2\pi tT)= 1 so what you have reduces to
a(T)\sqrt{2(1+ cos(2\pi tT))}

By the way, this has nothing to do with your question but that "tT" looks very strange to me. If it were t/T, then your sin and cosine functions would have a period of T, which I would interpret as a period of time. The way you have it their period is 1/T. It strikes me as strange to all something with units of "1/time", T.

You're completely right, the T there is actually frequency which is 1/T, I should have used a different letter other than T (which ofcourse usually means period).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top