What is the Acceleration of a Cheetah Reaching Full Speed in 3 Strides?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hiddenlife5009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
A cheetah accelerates from 0 to 18.0 m/s in three strides, each 4.1 m long, before reaching a full speed of 31.3 m/s. To calculate the acceleration, the time variable is not provided, but can be derived from average speed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using kinematic equations to solve for acceleration without needing explicit time. Ultimately, the participant successfully resolved the problem after considering these factors. The acceleration of the cheetah can be determined through proper application of the relevant equations.
hiddenlife5009
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cheetah, the fastest of all land animals over a short distance, can accelerate from zero to 18.0 m/s in three strides and to a full speed of 31.3 m/s in seconds. Assuming the first three strides are each 4.1 m long and that acceleration is constant until the cheetah reaches full speed, what is the cheetah's acceleration (in m/s2)?

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



It is a basic question, but I am over looking something because I cannot figure out which equation I should use. From what I know, I need time to find out what the acceleration is, but no time variable is stated. The question also gives you the stride lengths which just confuses me even more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should write out all the kinematic equations you know. Given the right equation, you won't need the time. But you can find the time by considering the average speed.
 
Doc Al said:
You should write out all the kinematic equations you know. Given the right equation, you won't need the time. But you can find the time by considering the average speed.

Thanks for the help, I have worked it out now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top