What is the acceleration of a jojo falling down a string?

  • Thread starter Thread starter olympiad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a jojo (yoyo) falling down a string, represented by a system of cylinders. The initial challenge involves determining the rotational inertia and applying the parallel axis theorem correctly. Participants suggest analyzing the problem using energy principles and Newton's second law for rotation, emphasizing the need to recalculate the rotational inertia accurately. The final formula for acceleration is derived, but concerns about its complexity and simplification remain. Overall, the conversation highlights the intricacies of rotational dynamics in this context.
olympiad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
an interesting problem

I came along this problem, it is quite interesting. However, I have worked with the problem to long and than you can't see any new ways. So I thought, maybe you guys could try it with a fresh mind. Good luck, it is a tough one (or I fail to see something obvious)
imagine a jojo on a string which can be represented by three clinders, the middle one(with the wire around it) with mass m1 and diameter/2(I don't know what that is in english, in dutch it is straal)R1, and the two cilinders on the sides of it both have mass m2 and R2.
first give the rotational inertia on a horizontal axis through the center of mass point.
that was easy, 1/2m1*r1^2+m2*r2^2.
the second question was: calculate the accelaration when the jojo falls down( it rolls down the wire and the axis all stay in the same alignment).
here I got stuck. I thought, you can analyse the movement as a pure rotation around the point where the wire is connected to the middle cilinder. then the angular momentum becomes 1/2m1*r1^2+m2*r2^2+(m1+2m2)*r1^2 (paralel axes law.) speed is then expressable as (m1+2m2)hg=1/2(Ip)W^2. However, if you fill this in and try to express the speed, you get a gigantic formula that can't be right. I must be taking a wrong route, after all, I need the acceleration, not the speed, but I don't know how to come there.
Help would be greatly appreciated.(I am always a bit messy in my work, so it is possible that I made a mistake in the start of the answer)
sorry for my poor english, especially on physics therms.
faithfully,
olympiad..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might be better off posting each question in its own thread. That said:

Question 1:
How about considering this as an energy problem? You should be able to figure out the torque and angular distance the that yoyo goes through.
 
YoYo problem

olympiad said:
first give the angular momentum on an axis through the gravity point(center of mass point)
that was easy, 1/2m1*r1^2+m2*r2^2.
I assume the question was: calculate the rotational inertia about the center of mass? If so, that's fine. (What you are calling "angular momentum" is actually the rotational inertia.)
the second question was: calculate the accelaration when the jojo falls down( it rolls down the wire and the axis all stay in the same alignment).
here I got stuck. I thought, you can analyse the movement as a pure rotation around the point where the wire is connected to the middle cilinder. then the angular momentum becomes 1/2m1*r1^2+m2*r2^2+m1*r1^2 (paralel axes law.) speed is then expressable as (m1+2m2)hg=1/2(Ip)W^2.
Again, what you are calling "angular momentum" seems to be the rotational inertia. I believe that you made an error in applying the parallel axis theorem. Redo that calculation as you will need it.

In any case, there is nothing wrong with treating the motion as instantaneously a pure rotation. I wouldn't bother calculating the speed. Instead, calculate the acceleration directly using Newton's 2nd law for rotation. You know the torque about that point and the rotational inertia (recalculate it).

PS: I agree with NateG. Take your second problem and create a new thread. (Then delete that post in this thread.)
 
Of course, that's much more logical. I wanted to take the differential formula of the speed, but that's the hard way I guess.
so the T=FR. F is g(m1+2m2), R is R1. T is R1*g(m1+2m2). T=Ia. the mistake I made in using the parallel axes theorem was that I didn't use all the mass, isn't it? the therm added should be (m1+2m2)R1^2, so I is 1/2m1*R1^2+m2*R2^2+(m1+2m2)R1^2. a= T/I so a is (R1*g(m1+2m2))/(1/2m1*R1^2+m2*R2^2+(m1+2m2)R1^2). Then, At(acceleration of the center point) is a*R1. so At(what I need)=(R1^2*g(m1+2m2))/(m2*R2^2+(1.5m1+2m2)R1^2).
Somehow that doesn't seem right.
The problem is that it isn't possible to simplify the formula since i can't turn the divider into one therm.
Is this right then?
thanks
 
Last edited:
olympiad said:
Is this right then?
Looks right to me.
 
ok. Thanks for the help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top