What is the Amplitude of a Pendulum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter potmobius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The amplitude of a pendulum refers to the maximum displacement from its equilibrium position. The formula for the period of a pendulum, T = 2π√(l/g), is valid only for small angles (approximately 5 degrees) due to the harmonic approximation. For larger displacements, the motion is described by a non-linear differential equation, and the period cannot be expressed using elementary functions. Instead, it involves elliptic integrals, which can be approximated using series expansions for small but non-negligible amplitudes. Ultimately, the period of a pendulum is influenced by its amplitude, and exact solutions are complex even for simple configurations.
potmobius
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
How can one determine the amplitude, frequency and period of an amplitude? this is not homework, i was just curious, because i knew how to find the time using the 2 pi sqrt(l/g), but wanted to know about this, since i am learning about waves and harmonic motion! Help would be appreciated. Thanks!





P.S. this is my first time using physics forums, so tell me if i should change the way i ask a question or if i made any kind of mistake :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Determine as in measure? Or as in calculate using Newton's laws?
 
The 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}} formula is only good for small amplitude displacements around 5 degrees, this is the harmonic approximation.

Lets look how we get this. Newton says, for the tangential component:

ml\ddot \varphi = - mg\sin\varphi

Where \varphi is the angle between the vertical and the string of the pendulum.

So the equation of motion for the pendulum:

\ddot\varphi = -\frac{g}{l}\sin\varphi

Now as we see this is a non-linear differential equation. For small displacements (i.e. small angles) that is:
\sin\varphi \approx \varphi

So:

\ddot\varphi = -\frac{g}{l}\varphi

As we see this equation describes simple harmonic motion, and we can extract the frequency of oscillations:

\omega^2=\frac{g}{l} \Longrightarrow T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega}=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}

So we obtained the formula for small displacements of the pendulum, and we can see that it (of course) doesn't depend on the amplitude...

Now if the displacements arent small we cannot approximate the sine like we did.

In this case after integrating the equation once and some manipulation, we obtain for the period:

T(\varphi_0)=4\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d\psi}{\sqrt{1-k^2\sin^2\psi}}

Where k=\sin\left(\frac{\varphi_0}{2}\right) Here \varphi_0 is the amplitude(maximum displacement) of the pendulum.

As we see this is an elliptic integral of the first kind. So the period of the pendulum at arbitrary amplitudes cannot be given using elementary functions.
We can however use a series approximation for the elliptic integral. Using this we get:

T(\varphi_0)=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left[\frac{(2n-1)!}{(2n)!}\sin^n\frac{\varphi_0}{2}\right]

If the amplitude is still small but not that big, then we can further approximate the sines (now I do it upto fourth order of the amplitude):

T(\varphi_0)=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}\left[1+\frac{1}{16}\varphi_0^2+\frac{11}{3072}\varphi_0^4 +\dots\right]

So we can conclude that, we can't get an exact solution even for such trivial and simple configurations...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top