What is the Angular Acceleration of a Rod Released From Rest at an Angle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a uniform rod with an attached weight, released from rest at a 37° angle. Initial calculations incorrectly assumed the net torque of the bar was zero and neglected the inertia of the attached weight. Participants emphasized the importance of considering the angle of the rod and the need to apply conservation of energy for further calculations. A follow-up problem regarding the angular velocity of the rod when vertical was also addressed, highlighting the distinction between free fall and rotational motion. The conversation ultimately points to the necessity of incorporating both the rod and the weight's inertia for accurate results.
TG3
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform rod with of weight of 10 kg and length of 5.8 m is pivoted at its center and a small weight of mass 5.15 kg is rigidly attached to one end. You may neglect the size of the weight and assume it is located right at the end of the rod. The system is released from rest at a 37° angle. There are no external forces. What is the angular acceleration just after it is released?

Homework Equations



Torque = Angular Acceleration times Inertia
Torque = Force times Distance from pivot
Inertia of a uniformly weighted bar = 1/12 M L^2
I = Icm + M D^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the bar is pivoting about it's center, the net torque of the bar itself is zero. (One side balances the other out.)
The torque of the weight is 2.9 x 50.52 = 146.51
146.51 = I times angular acceleration.
The inertia of the bar = 1/12 (10) 5.8^2 = 28.033
146.5 / 28.033 = 5.226
This is wrong. Clearly I need to calculate the Inertia for the Weight, not just the bar, but since the problem says to neglect the size of the weight, I assume you have to treat it as part of the bar.
How do you calculate the inertia for a non-uniform bar?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TG3 said:
The torque of the weight is 2.9 x 50.52 = 146.51
That would be true if the bar were horizontal, but it's not. Consider the angle.
 
Ah yes. That did it. Thanks!
I'm also having trouble with a follow up problem:

What is the angular velocity when the rod is vertical?

The distance the rod falls is 1.15m, since sin 37 x 2.9 = 1.745 and 2.9- 1.74 = 1.15.
Final Velocity of an object falling in free fall is the square root of 2gy, so 9.81 x 1.15 x 2 = 4.7598
Angular Velocity = Tangential Velocity / radius
W = 4.7598 / 2.9
W = 1.64, according to my (wrong) calculations.
 
TG3 said:
The distance the rod falls is 1.15m, since sin 37 x 2.9 = 1.745 and 2.9- 1.74 = 1.15.
OK. The end of the rod falls that distance.
Final Velocity of an object falling in free fall is the square root of 2gy, so 9.81 x 1.15 x 2 = 4.7598
Nothing is in free fall here. (The rod rotates about a pivot, which exerts a force on it.)

Instead, consider conservation of energy. Find the rotational KE of the system.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top