What is the Annual Rate of Return for a Charitable Foundation's Donation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cs23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the annual rate of return for a charitable foundation that received a $4 million donation, with specific yearly grant distributions. The initial plan involves awarding $200,000 annually for five years, followed by grants of $1 million per year indefinitely, based on interest earned. An initial calculation suggested a rate of return of 31.57%, which participants felt was excessively high. It was proposed that the solution should be approached iteratively, with a more realistic expected rate of around 15%. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of accurately determining the rate of return given the structure of the grants.
cs23
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charitable foundation received a donation from a wealthy building contractor in the amount of $4 million. It specifies that $200,000 is to be awarded each year for 5 years starting now (i.e., 6 awards) to a university engaged in research pertaining to the development of layered composite materials. Thereafter, grants equal to the amount of interest earned each year are to be made. If the size of the grants from year 6 into the indefinite future is expected to be $1,000,000 per year, what annual rate of return is the foundation earning?


Homework Equations



PWd=PWr

The Attempt at a Solution



PWd= PWr
4=0.2 + 0.2(P/A,i,5) + 1(P/A,i,infinity)
3.8 = 0.2(P/A,i,5) + 1(P/A,i,infinity)
3.8=0.2(1/i) +1(1/i)
3.8 = 1.2(1/i)+(1/i)
i= 31.57%

it seems too high, any help would be appreciated


i= 31.57%
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you assume the rate of return is the same the entire time (i.e. during the initial 6-year period and thereafter), what you have is a uniform series (I think that's the right term) for 6 years such that the future value of that series will have interest of exactly $1M per year. I believe the solution needs to be obtained iteratively and should be around 15%.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top