What is the Average Pushing Force a Human Can Exert?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flfgw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacity Human
AI Thread Summary
The average pushing force a human can exert is a topic of debate, with estimates varying based on factors like equipment and individual strength. One contributor suggested that the maximum force could be around 175 kiloNewtons, equating to approximately 18 tonnes, but this figure was questioned as potentially excessive. The discussion highlights the ambiguity in defining average force, considering variables such as the use of simple machines and friction. The mention of strongman Mariusz Pudzianowski indicates that extreme cases can skew perceptions of average capabilities. Overall, the conversation reflects uncertainty and the need for clearer definitions in measuring human exertion.
flfgw
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Does anyone know the average pushing force a human being can exert?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I did some research online but didn't find anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the question is rather ambiguous. 1. with help of pulley or any other simple machine? 2. account for muscle (prob?) 3. friction?

I looked up "strongest man alive" and I got: Mariusz Pudzianowski

So I guess you can look at his stats and conclude on that.
 
I believe the average maximum force would be around 175 kiloNewtons
 
ninjaDUDE said:
I believe the average maximum force would be around 175 kiloNewtons

Are you sure about that? Thats 18 tonnes of weight. Seems a bit much.
 
Gib Z said:
Are you sure about that? Thats 18 tonnes of weight. Seems a bit much.

woops i meant 17.5
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top