What is the average time between collisions for conduction electrons in copper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jromega3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average time between collisions (T) for conduction electrons in copper using the formula T = (Vd)(Me)/(-e)(E). The user initially calculates the drift velocity (Vd) based on given current and dimensions of a copper wire, leading to a value of 9.4 x 10^-5 m/s. They encounter difficulty in determining the electric field (E) from the provided information, despite knowing the resistivity of copper. After some back-and-forth on the equations and variables, the user realizes they can derive the current density (J) to find E, ultimately leading to a solution. The discussion highlights the challenges of applying theoretical equations to practical problems in physics.
jromega3
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


compute the average time between collisions T for conduction electrons in copper.


Homework Equations


Vd=-e*E*T/(Me)
Where e is electron's charge
E is electric Field
T is what I'm solving for
And Me is mass of the electron

Vd=I/PA


The Attempt at a Solution



so it was given that a copper wire with a 1.0mm diameter had a current of 1A...and it's mass density is 8900kg/m^3.
So m= 1 electron(8900kg/m^3)(6.02X10^23 atoms/0.0635kg) = 8.4 X 10^28/m^3
So
Vd=1A/(8.4X10^28 m^-3)(1.6X10^-19C)(7.9x10^-7m^2) = 9.4 x 10^-5 m/s

So now...
Vd=-e*E*T/(Me)

So T=(Vd)(Me)/(-e)(E)
I have Vd, Me is mass of the electron, and -e is charge of the electron. I need the electric force...and am stumped. How do I get it from the given info? Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Current density J = I/A, And resistivity of the material rho = E/J.
E = rho*I/A. For copper rho = 1.72x10^-8ohm.m
Vd = J/nq, where n is electron density in copper = 8.5x10^28 m^-3.
See whether these hints helpful to solve the problem.
 
Ok, so I get E=rho*J.....or since I don't know J J is also Vd*nq...so I get E=rho*Vd*nq...
so my equation becomes T=(Vd)(Me)/(-e)(rho)(Vd)(Nq)
stuff cancels and I get Me/(-e)(rho)(Nq) and I get a really wrong number. hmm
Edit. Nevermind...my bad. We Have I and A can be easily solved giving J. Thanks again, always appreciated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top