What is the best approach to solving this Statics problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter faust9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pain Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a challenging statics problem involving forces and spring mechanics. Various approaches were attempted, including breaking the system into vectors and triangles, but none were successful initially. Key insights include using the balance of forces along a specific line segment and applying Pythagorean principles to relate distances and angles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying points and forces in the diagram to avoid confusion. Ultimately, the participants clarify their calculations and relationships between forces, leading to a better understanding of the problem.
faust9
Messages
690
Reaction score
2
Argh! Statics is a pain.

Argh, this problem is killing me. I've tried a couple of approaches to this proble. First approach was to break it into 4 'Y' shaped vectors with with points A,B,C,D as the centers of the 'Y'. No avail. The next approach was to couple the forces to the origin but the forces cancel out when I do that. The third approach was to divide the quadralateral into 4 triangles with the y-axis equal to 1/2 y = 30lbf, and x-axis = (2-s)=1/2(s)(40). Again to no avail.


Any help would be appreciated. Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • statics.jpg
    statics.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org
The symmetry of the problem makes it sufficient to require balance of forces on the line segment AC.
Split the work in two steps:
1. Let x be the distance from A to the centre. Then, using Pythagoras, you have:
x^(2)+(y/2)^2=4.
By making use of this expression, you may find the the additional stetch of the spring as a function of y, and hence, the magnitude of the spring force.
2. Decompose the spring force and F along AC, and require equilibrium of forces.
 
Just to rectify a flawed answer:
If a is the angle between the horizontal axis and AC, the component of F along AC is Fsin(a), and this entails a forcecomponent at A in the horizontal direction Fsin(a)cos(a).
Requiring balancing of forces at A in the horizontal direction yields then:
2Fsin(a)cos(a)-K=0, where K is the spring force.
Note that sin(a)=(y/2)/2.
 
It's getting late; the rectified answer was also wrong:
The unit vector AC is cos(a)i+sin(a)j. The unit vector DC is -cos(a)i +sin(a)j.
Hence, Fj =1/(2sin(a))*(AC+DC), or the component of F along AC is F/(2sin(a))AC.
The horizontal comp of F is therefore Fcotan(a)/2.
 
I had a similar problem. Ever time I thought I had the answer, I found a problem. Thanks for you insight and help.
 
To make it perfectly clear:
Step 1.
You should find that the total stretch of the spring is 1.5+(2-x), where x is the length from A to the centre (expressed by Pyth. in y).

Step 2.
A careful balance of forces :
a)
Equilibrium of A requires the balance between the stresses T in rods AC and AB together with the spring force K.
The vertical force balance at A requires that the magnitudes of the stresses in AC and AB is equal (T).
The horizontal balance yields T in terms of the angle and K, T=K/(2cos(a)).

b)
By requiring equilibrium at C, you will find 2Tsin(a)=F, or finally

F=Ktan(a)

(This agrees with the last post, since the equilibrium at A required there must include the contribution of the force -F transmitted as stress from B through rod AB).
 
If you think "statics" is a pain, wait until you get to "dynamics"!

At least in statics everything stands still!
 
I guess I'm not the brightest bulb on the christmas tree, but I still don't get it. Arildno, ar you using the correct line segment notation (i.e. when you say AB do you mean AB or AD) because what your saying doesn't match up with the diagram, so I don't know what you are using as your point of reference. Also, when you say F=Ktan(a) where K is the spring force do you mean K is the spring constant or K is k(1.5+\Deltas) where \Deltas is the change in length along the x-axis? Also, you stated the spring force was F, so how are you accounting for the verticle forces F and -F from the diagram?

Thanks.
 
Oh dear..
1. I have used "A" for "C" and vice versa (terribly sorry)
(Hence, my AC is really from C to A in the diagram (in ordinary terms, CA))
AB should read CB.
2. Spring force K is the force, not spring constant.
3. I cannot see I have termed the spring force K as F anywhere;
I'll look over it.
 
  • #10
I hope the following is clearer:
a)
Force equilibrium at C (on the diagram):
3 forces are involved:
Spring force Kvec, in vector form: -Ki, where K is magnitude of Kvec.
Forces due to stresses in CA and CB:
In the j'th direction, we find that the magnitudes of the stresses in CA and CB must be equal, T, so in the horizontal direction, we have:
2Tcos(a)-K=0 (a is the angle CA makes with the horizontal)
This entails that the stress in each rod is given by T=K/(2cos(a))

b) Force equilibrium at A (at the diagram)
3 forces are involved:
External force Fvec, in vector form: Fi, where F is magnitude of Fvec.
Forces due to stresses in CA and CD:
In the i'th direction, we find that the magnitudes of the stresses in CA and CD must be equal.
In addition the stress in CA is equal along the whole rod (T), so the stress in CD must also equal T.
In the vertical, j'th direction, we have:
-2Tsin(a)+F=0 (a is the angle CA makes with the horizontal)
This entails that the stress in each rod is given by T=F/(2sin(a)).
c)
However, in CA, we now have two expressions for T (from a) and b)).
These must be equal:
F/(2sin(a))=K/(2cos(a)), or F=Ktan(a)

Teribly sorry for adding to your confusion.
 
  • #11
If k is the spring force i still have two unknowns (angle and delta s) and one equation.
 
  • #12
You are to determine the displacement y given F.
By Pythagoras, you have x^(2)+(y/2)^(2)=4. (Right?)
cos(a)=x/2, sin(a)=y/2, and delta s=2-x.
Hence, you really have only one unknown, (y), and one equation F=Ktan(a)
(K=k(1.5+(2-x))).
 
  • #13
Oops :sin(a)=(y/2)/2
 
  • #14
Clear as glass now thanks a lot.
 
Back
Top