What Is the Cardinality of Bloch Waves in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cardinality Waves
jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
According to the Bloch's theorem, the solutions of SE in a periodic potential may be written as superpositions of Bloch waves. But what kind of superpositions are these? There is the continuous wave vector parameter, over which we can integrate just like in forming free wave packets, but what about the cardinality of solutions for some fixed wave vector. Are the wave equations for fixed wave vector always like this

<br /> \psi(x) = \sum_j u_j(x)e^{ikx},<br />

where u_j(x) is some sequence (or finite amount) of periodic functions, or could they be like this

<br /> \psi(x) = \int d\alpha\; u(x,\alpha) e^{ikx}<br />

where we have periodic functions x\mapsto u(x,\alpha) for each \alpha, where \alpha is a continuous parameter?

EDIT: Now I see that this is a very strange question, because those superpositions of periodic functions (with same periodicity) are still periodic. I'm not sure what I was thinking... I think I was thinking about how to write superpositions in respect to the wave vector k, but then changed the question while typing this. Can there even be several periodic parts u(x) for some fixed wave vector? Perhaps I should start writing these questions on paper before posting them? :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave vector k is not directly related to the energy with Bloch waves. How many different Bloch waves

<br /> \psi_j(x) = u_j(x) e^{ik_j x}<br />

can there be corresponding to the same energy? Could there be eigenstates of the Hamiltonian which have the form

<br /> \psi(x) = \int d\alpha\; \psi_{\alpha}(x) = \int d\alpha\; u(x,\alpha) e^{ik(\alpha) x}?<br />
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top