What is the condition for the Jacobian transformation when changing variables?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions for applying the Jacobian transformation when changing variables in a multi-variable function. It is stated that one can transform the variables (u, v, w) to (s, r, t) while keeping h unchanged, leading to the equation f(u,v,w,h) du dv dw dh = G(r,s,t,h) J(r,s,t) dr ds dt dh. The key condition for this transformation is that the transformation must be "nice," which typically means it is smooth and invertible. Additionally, to maintain consistency, it is suggested to treat h as a fourth variable, denoting the new variable as h'. The transformation is valid as long as these conditions are met.
femas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Assume that I have f(u,v,w,h) du dv dw dh and I need only to change three variables (u, v, w) say to other variables called (s, r, t) and keep h as is it is

So my question can I write this as

f(u,v,w,h) du dv dw dh = G(r,s,t,h) J(r,s,t) dr ds dt dh

where J is jacobian transformation. What is the condition that has to be satisfied?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can always do it (as long as the transformation is nice). If you want to be completely consistent, let h' (new) = h (old) so you will be working with a four variable transformation.
 
Thanks for your reply!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top