What Is the Correct Approach to Solving \(\int \frac{1}{dx}\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sara991
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \(\int \frac{1}{dx}\) is fundamentally nonsensical and cannot be solved. Participants in the discussion clarified that the correct expression should be \(\int \frac{1}{x}\,dx\). The integral \(\int dx\) represents the sum of infinitesimally small quantities, while \(\frac{1}{dx}\) implies an uncountably large quantity, leading to confusion. The thread concluded with a consensus that without proper context or a complete problem statement, further explanation is futile.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with the notation of differentials (dx)
  • Knowledge of the properties of limits and infinitesimals
  • Basic skills in mathematical problem formulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the correct formulation of integrals, focusing on \(\int \frac{1}{x}\,dx\)
  • Learn about the concept of differentials and their role in calculus
  • Explore the implications of infinitesimals in calculus
  • Review common mistakes in integral calculus to avoid confusion
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to clarify misconceptions in integral notation and its applications.

Sara991
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How do I solve this integral?

<br /> \int \frac{1}{dx}<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't. Did you by chance mean

\int \frac{1}{x}\,dx
 
Hi dear

I mean:
<br /> \int \frac{1}{dx}<br />
 
That expression doesn't make sense. Where did it come from?
 
I encounter with this, when I am solving a problem.
 
Then please give the entire problem. As vela said,
\int \frac{1}{dx}
simply doesn't mean anything.
 
So Sorry, I am not able to explain it.
 
Well, since \int dx[/tex] means a sum (\int) of an uncountably large amount of infinitesimally small numbers (dx&#039;s)...<br /> <br /> and since, if dx is infinitesimally small, 1/dx would be uncountably large...<br /> <br /> Then \int \frac{1}{dx} means a sum of an uncountably large amount of uncountably large numbers...<br /> <br /> and so is uncountably large itself.
 
Ugh, first the opening poster won't go into where she got the expression so we can point out what she did wrong, but now people are giving her questionable advice. :frown:

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K