What is the Correct Result for This Triple Integral Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a triple integral of the form I = ∫∫∫ (x² + y²) dxdydz over a specified region defined by z = 2 and x² + y² = 2z, with the constraint that z ≥ 0. The original poster attempts to solve this using cylindrical coordinates but encounters discrepancies in the results based on different setups of the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two different approaches to setting up the limits of integration, leading to different results: 16π/3 and 32π/3. There is a focus on the correct interpretation of the region of integration and the limits for z and r.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring the implications of the limits of integration, with one suggesting that the limits for z in one case are incorrect. There is an acknowledgment of the need to verify the limits and the potential for a misunderstanding regarding the geometry of the region defined by the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly interpreting the geometric shape represented by the equations, with some confusion arising from the nature of the surface defined by x² + y² = 2z compared to a standard cone. Additionally, the discussion includes considerations of the Jacobian in cylindrical coordinates and the impact of theta on the integration limits.

Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I=(triple intgral)(x2+y2)dxdydz.

D:
z=2
x2+y2=2z
z>=0


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I used cylindrical coordinates to solve this. But I came across a problem.

When I fix z between 0 and 2, and r between 0 and sqrt(2z) I get 16pi/3
{0<z<2; 0<r<sqrt(2z)}

But when I fix r between 0 and 2, and z between 0 and r^2/2 i get 32pi/3
{0<r<2; 0<z<r2/2}
I cannot find error anywhere in the process of calculating. What is the right result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the theta dependence?
 
thats 2pi in both cases. 0<theta<2pi

Jacobian = r
 
Oh.. right, I noticed the pi in your results but didn't see the 0<theta<2pi in your setup of the limits. I'll work through it and get back to you.
 
Thanks. Pay attention to my limits. I probably got them wrong in one case.
 
I am getting (4/3)pi. Also, the graph of it is just an upside down cone correct, so using the volume of a cone formula is also got (4/3)pi, just checking my integration.
 
Well no. Because its x^2+y^2=2z. That is not an upside down cone. Its wide a bit.

Case you are speaking is: x^2+y^2=z^2
 
Duh. thanks, i see what i did.
 
Here is what you have presumably done in both cases:

[tex]\int_0^2 dr r \int_0^{2\pi}d\phi \int_0^{r^2/2} dz r^2 = 2\pi \int_0^2 dr r^3 \times \left. z \right|_{0}^{r^2/2} = \pi \int_0^{2} dr~r^5 = \pi \frac{2^6}{6} = \frac{32\pi}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\int_0^2 dz \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \int_0^{\sqrt{2z}} dr r^3 = 2\pi \int_0^2 dz \frac{4z^2}{4} = 2\pi \frac{2^3}{3} = \frac{16\pi}{3}[/tex]

I think the trouble is that in the second case, you write [itex]r = \sqrt{2z}[/itex], where you have taken the positive root only. However, the negative root still exists: [itex](r,\phi) = (-\sqrt{2z},\phi) \equiv (\sqrt{2z},\phi-\pi)[/itex]. So, I think you must also add the "negative root" contribution to the second integral:

[tex]\int_0^2 dz \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} d\phi \int_0^{\sqrt{2z}} dr r^3 = 2\pi \int_0^2 dz \frac{4z^2}{4} = 2\pi \frac{2^3}{3} = \frac{16\pi}{3}[/tex]

Adding them together gives you [itex]32\pi/3[/itex], as in the first case.
 
  • #10
Mute said:
Here is what you have presumably done in both cases:

[tex]\int_0^2 dr r \int_0^{2\pi}d\phi \int_0^{r^2/2} dz r^2 = 2\pi \int_0^2 dr r^3 \times \left. z \right|_{0}^{r^2/2} = \pi \int_0^{2} dr~r^5 = \pi \frac{2^6}{6} = \frac{32\pi}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\int_0^2 dz \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \int_0^{\sqrt{2z}} dr r^3 = 2\pi \int_0^2 dz \frac{4z^2}{4} = 2\pi \frac{2^3}{3} = \frac{16\pi}{3}[/tex]

I think the trouble is that in the second case, you write [itex]r = \sqrt{2z}[/itex], where you have taken the positive root only. However, the negative root still exists: [itex](r,\phi) = (-\sqrt{2z},\phi) \equiv (\sqrt{2z},\phi-\pi)[/itex]. So, I think you must also add the "negative root" contribution to the second integral:

[tex]\int_0^2 dz \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} d\phi \int_0^{\sqrt{2z}} dr r^3 = 2\pi \int_0^2 dz \frac{4z^2}{4} = 2\pi \frac{2^3}{3} = \frac{16\pi}{3}[/tex]

Adding them together gives you [itex]32\pi/3[/itex], as in the first case.

Thank you for you reply. Unfortunately that is not the case. You take only positive side because of the condition z>=0;

I solved the problem after half an hour of busting my head. Limits are wrong in the second case, where you get 32pi/3. z goes from r2/2 to 2

{r2/2<z<2}

This makes the result 16pi/3 like in the first case.

I think someone can verify this.
 
  • #11
Bassalisk said:
Limits are wrong in the second case, where you get 32pi/3. z goes from r2/2 to 2

{r2/2<z<2}

This makes the result 16pi/3 like in the first case.

.

Yes.
 
  • #12
wbandersonjr said:
Yes.

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K