What is the Current Understanding of Monopoles in Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Reliable sources for understanding monopoles in physics include foundational theoretical papers by P. A. M. Dirac, which discuss quantized singularities and the theory of magnetic poles. Experimental research, such as the studies by R. L. Fleischer and Thron et al., explores the search for magnetic monopoles in various environments. The Wikipedia article on magnetic monopoles serves as a good introductory resource. Despite challenges in finding comprehensive information, these references provide a solid starting point for a freshman research paper. Overall, these sources cover both theoretical and experimental aspects of monopoles effectively.
Abscissas
Messages
65
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am looking for reliable sources with decent information on monopoles, this is a freshman research paper. I am just looking for books websites and any useful information on the topic. thank you


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've gone to the library and surfed the internet but have found minimal reliable information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a very first introduction, the Wikipedia article seems to be pretty good:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopoles

The classical theoretical papers are

P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 133, 60 (1931)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/95639

P. A. M. Dirac, Theory of Magnetic Poles, Phys. Rev. 74, 817 (1948)
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PR/v74/i7/p817

T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3845 (1975), http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v12/i12/p3845

Some experimental papers:

R. L. Fleischer et al., Search for Magnetic Monopoles in Deep Ocean Deposits, Phys. Rev. 184, 3845 (1969)
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PR/v184/i5/p1393

Thron et al., Search for Magnetic Monopoles with the Soudan 2 Detector, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4846 (1992)
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v46/p4846
 
Thank you very much this will be very helpful especially the experimental papers.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top