What is the Definition of Resistivity and its Relationship to Resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Resistivity is defined as a material property that quantifies how strongly a given material opposes the flow of electric current. It is not directly proportional to any physical dimensions, unlike resistance, which is directly proportional to the length of the conductor and inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area. The relationship between resistivity, resistance, length, and area is expressed by the formula: Resistance = Resistivity * (length/area). Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately defining resistivity in the context of electrical properties. Clear definitions and relationships are essential for A-level physics revision.
ghostbuster25
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
I am revising for my A levels and I have noticed that a common question on the paper is to define RESISTIVITY.

I have looked and looked but found no definitive description or a good definition.

I know the formula but is it right to just say that "resistivity is directly proportional to a conductors length and inversely proportional to its area. and is the resistance electrons face while flowing through it"

Is there any bette way of writing this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ghostbuster25! :smile:
ghostbuster25 said:
I know the formula but is it right to just say that "resistivity is directly proportional to a conductors length and inversely proportional to its area. and is the resistance electrons face while flowing through it"

nooo, that's wrong :redface:

resistance is directly proportional to a conductors length and inversely proportional to its area …

resistivity (like density) isn't proportional to any dimension :wink:

i'd start by saying that https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=241" is a property of a material, and is the resistance … :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Resistance = Resistivity * (length/area) where resistivity is a material property.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top