What is the difference between Potential and Potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between potential and potential energy, noting that potential is the energy per unit quantity, such as gravitational potential energy per unit mass or electrostatic potential energy per unit charge. Potential difference, particularly in circuits, is described as the voltage, which represents the change in potential energy for a charge moving between two points. The conversation emphasizes that when an electron moves through different potentials, it gains kinetic energy as potential energy decreases, with the total energy measured in joules remaining constant. Additionally, it is highlighted that an electron will not move between two points of equal potential, as there would be no potential difference to drive the movement. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the principles of energy transfer in electrical circuits.
Googl
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

I am currently on Engineering course, so this will be the perfect place to ask questions where I am having some problems. I hope you will help and I will thank you for that in advance.

I am not sure whether how I understand the difference between potential and Potential energy is how I should understand the two. What is the difference between Potential and Potential energy? and how do you connect the two with Potential difference.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential is the specific potential energy. That is, when potential energy depends on some quantity associated with object in question, potential is potential energy per unit of that quantity.

For example, gravitational potential is gravitational potential energy per unit of mass. Electrostatic potential is the electrostatic potential energy per unit of charge.
 
  • Like
Likes Mia_S and SOUMEN SAMANTA
Potential is simply per unit while Potential energy is per quantity is that all what I am supposed to assume, nothing more complex?

Could you please talk about potential difference specially in connection with Circuits and Point charges.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes Mia_S
Potential energy is just an amount of energy, measured in Joules.
Potential is energy per charge, measured in Joules/Coulomb.

This youtube tutor will explain it all to you very easily, just watch his sequence of videos on 'electric potential and potential energy'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Googl said:
Could you please talk about potential difference specially in connection with Circuits and Point charges.
When you talk about circuits, you are always talking about electrostatic potential. Difference between electrostatic potentials between two points is the voltage. Voltage is the amount of potential energy change for 1 coulomb of charge moving from first point to the second.

If you have a vacuum tube, effectively giving you no resistance, an electron traveling across 1V gap would gain kinetic energy equal to potential energy drop, which is the charge of electron * 1V, or in units of electron charge, this is energy of 1 electron-volt (eV).

In a circuit, however, all this energy is dissipated as heat. If one coulomb of charge moves across 1V of potential, 1J of heat has been produced. Since current is charge flow per unit time, current time voltage gives you amount of energy going into heat per unit of time, or power.
 
Thanks,

When you say voltage is the amount of potential energy change moving from first point to the second, should I assume that I could find voltage simply by subtracting the potential energy the charge has at the second point from the potential energy the charge had at the first point?

You said 1V gap, I am assuming that the potential at point A would be 5 and point B would be 4 not on the electron but within the field, when you place an electron in the field it will gain potential energy and move due to the potential energy which is now converted into kinetic energy. Am I right? Or potential energy is converted while in progress. All forms of energy are measured in joules so when you say kinetic energy = 34 joules the energy would be the same as saying potential energy = 34 joules. the quantity of energy is the same. So when an electron gains 34 joules of potential energy it will be converted to 34 joules of kinetic energy without any loss except, potential energy would go down to 0 because of the kinetic energy gain.

I am trying to understand this. When an electron is placed in field at point A which has potential 6V the electron will gain potential energy and move. The potential at point B has a potential of 2V, the electron is moving towards B from A. won't there be an affect on the electron as it moves through the different potentials, so when it reaches 4V there might be an affect. What will that be. I am anticipating that when the potential at A is 6V and the potential at B is 6V then the electron will not move. Is that right? Will it gain potential energy? What will be the outcome there? Is it conventional that when an electron has to move between two points the potential at those points has to be the different?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top