What is the Direction of Force in a Falling Object's Free-Body Diagram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ascendant78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamic Forces
AI Thread Summary
In a free-body diagram for a falling object, the direction of force due to gravity is negative, indicating acceleration towards the ground at 9.8 m/s². The gravitational force acting on a 40 kg person is calculated as -392 N. There is a discussion about whether to represent this force as -392 N due to its direction or as a positive magnitude. It is clarified that force is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction, and the direction of movement does not necessarily align with the direction of the force. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting free-body diagrams in physics.
Ascendant78
Messages
327
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 40kg person is falling at the speed of gravity, 9.8m/s^2. Wind resistance is not considered. On your free-body diagram, the direction they are falling (ground) is in the negative direction, hence gravity is causing an acceleration in the negative.

Homework Equations



F(gravity) = (40)(-9.8)
F(gravity) = -392N

The Attempt at a Solution



I am simply curious when solving a problem such as this, would N be a -392N since it is traveling in the negative on the free-body diagram, or is it seen a magnitude and considered a positive number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ascendant78 said:
I am simply curious when solving a problem such as this, would N be a -392N since it is traveling in the negative on the free-body diagram, or is it seen a magnitude and considered a positive number?

Force is a vector therefore it has a direction. Also the direction of the movement of the object and the direction of the force do not have to me the same. For example a ball going up after you throw it moves up but the force acting on it is downward.
 
Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top