What is the distance to the nucleus when the particle's velocity is zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter photon_mass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance to a nucleus when a charged particle is projected towards it with a specific kinetic energy. The participant attempts to derive the equations governing the motion of the particle under the influence of the Coulomb force, recognizing that the force is position-dependent. They express confusion over the calculations and the application of Newton's second law in this context. The concept of the distance of closest approach is introduced, indicating that this distance occurs when the particle's kinetic energy equals the electrostatic potential energy. The participant acknowledges a misunderstanding of the original question, seeking further clarification on the calculations involved.
photon_mass
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
potential = 0
particle of mass m charge q is projected with kinetic energy K at a nucleus mass M charge Q that is at rest. it is shot with 'perfect aim' (along the x axis).
find the distance x to the nucleus when dx/dt of particle is zero.

i know that F = dK/dt = cqQ/x^2 where c = 1/4pi(epsillon naught)

.5m(d/dt)v^2 = cqQ/x^2 (1)

the coulomb force is position dependent force, so:

.5m(dv^2/dx)(dx/dt) = cqQ/x^2 (2)

.5m(dv^3) = cqQ(dx/x^2) (3)

this doesn't make any sense to me. it makes more sense to take the time derivative in (1) just giving Newtons 2nd, and then doing the position dependence.

ma = cqQ/x^2

mvdv = cqQ(dx/x^2)
.5mv^2 = -cqQ/x

and then ?

i got nothing. any suggestions, clarifications or anything of the like would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance of closest approach is attained when the kinetic energy of the particle wholly equals the electrostatic potential energy of the system constituted by the nucleus and particle. If you are unclear about the calculations and the sense they ought to make, look this up: Distance of Closest Approach.
 
oh geez. i read the question wrong.
thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top