What is the Double Special Relativity theory?

Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
What is the Double Special Relativity theory? I know what SR is, but D SR? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, someone was not very happy about the Lorentz contractions and so made a theory that the length was unchanging from wherever you looked at it and he related this to Plank's length and plank's energy. This may be wrong but this is what I know about this weird theory.

Hope I could help
Srijan
 


The Double Special Relativity (DSR) theory is a modification of the original Special Relativity (SR) theory proposed by Albert Einstein. While SR describes the relationship between space and time for objects moving at constant speeds, DSR takes into account the possibility of a maximum speed limit (the speed of light) and the non-commutativity of space-time coordinates.

DSR arose from the need to reconcile the principles of SR with quantum mechanics, which suggests that there is a fundamental length scale in the universe. This means that at very small scales, space and time behave differently than at larger scales.

In DSR, the speed of light is still considered to be the maximum speed, but the way in which it is measured is modified. This results in a modified Lorentz transformation, which describes how space and time coordinates change for objects in motion. Additionally, DSR introduces a new symmetry, known as the "doubly special relativity," which states that the laws of physics should be the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion.

Overall, DSR aims to provide a more complete understanding of the relationship between space, time, and the fundamental forces of the universe. While it is still a theoretical concept, DSR has the potential to shed light on some of the unanswered questions in modern physics.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top