What is the energy density and total energy of an electric field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy density of an electric field, particularly in relation to an electron. Initially, there was uncertainty about whether the equation U = 1/2 ε₀ E² applies to a single electron due to the derivation method, which neglects self-energy. The argument is made that the equation can still be valid for a single electron, particularly when considering its interaction with quarks in a proton. It is suggested that the energy density of the electron can be integrated up to a protonic radius, indicating that the field energy of the electron is significant. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of calculating energy in electric fields and the parallels with gravitational energy.
Antiphon
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
4
In another recent thread it was being discussed whether there is energy in the field of an electron according to U = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_0 E^2.

I began by saying "yes", then changed to "no" because of the way the equation was derived. (It was derived by bringing together N=2 or more charges and ignoring the self-energy of each electron.)

I now wish to change my answer back to "yes", that the equation still works even for a single electron though the volume limits of integration (and therefore the exact value of the energy) is not known.

My argument is that it can be applied to the three quarks in the proton. From a great distance the proton an electron have the same charge and therefore you should be able to integrate the energy density of the electron according to the above equation at least up the exclusion of a sphere of protonic radius. The field energy of the electron should be at least this great and probably greater since it is smaller in size than the proton.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field#Energy_in_the_electric_field

The energy density of the electric field is given by:
e6909617aaece890a9d11784ece37423.png

The total energy stored in the electric field in a given volume V is therefore
08478cc1187011231c2dafd27045b7c2.png

See also teh section below that titled "Parallels between electrostatics and gravity"this is for gravity but the equations are the same
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_binding_energy
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SphereGravitationalPotentialEnergy.html
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top