What Is the Energy Difference in the Stern-Gerlach Experiment with Silver Atoms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy difference in the Stern-Gerlach experiment using silver atoms, focusing on the spin of the valence electron. The user correctly identifies the energy equations for the two spin states but encounters an issue with the refined g-factor value of 2.00232. It is clarified that using g=2 is acceptable for simplicity and aligns with standard textbook practices. The user concludes that the discrepancy in results stems from the choice of the g-factor, opting to use the simpler value for calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in quantum mechanics while acknowledging practical simplifications.
big man
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
OK I just have one more question haha.

Question:
Consider the original Stern-Gerlach experiment employing an atomic beam of silver, for which the magnetic moment is due entirely to the spin of the single valence electron of the silver atom. Assuming the magnetic field B has a magnitude 0.500 T, compute the energy difference in electron volts of the silver atoms in the two exiting beams.

What I've done:

So we're looking at an electron, which has a spin quantum number of s=1/2.
So the z component of the spin angular momentum will be.

Sz = ms*hbar

Where ms is the spin magnetic quantum number. There are two different orientations of 1/2 and -1/2 that result in the different defelctions of the beams.

So the energy for ms = 1/2 is:

E = (1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

And for ms = -1/2

E = (-1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

To find the energy difference I subtracted the two energies, which yielded:

deltaE = hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

e is the charge of the electron and m is the mass of the electron and g is the g factor (g = 2.00232).

So the above equation can now be expressed as

deltaE = Ub*g*B

Where Ub is the bohr magneton.

But this answer is wrong. It would work out if I didn't use the refined value of g and just used 2.

What am I doing wrong?
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
big man said:
OK I just have one more question haha.

Question:
Consider the original Stern-Gerlach experiment employing an atomic beam of silver, for which the magnetic moment is due entirely to the spin of the single valence electron of the silver atom. Assuming the magnetic field B has a magnitude 0.500 T, compute the energy difference in electron volts of the silver atoms in the two exiting beams.

What I've done:

So we're looking at an electron, which has a spin quantum number of s=1/2.
So the z component of the spin angular momentum will be.

Sz = ms*hbar

Where ms is the spin magnetic quantum number. There are two different orientations of 1/2 and -1/2 that result in the different defelctions of the beams.

So the energy for ms = 1/2 is:

E = (1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

And for ms = -1/2

E = (-1/2)*hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

To find the energy difference I subtracted the two energies, which yielded:

deltaE = hbar*(e/2m)*g*B

e is the charge of the electron and m is the mass of the electron and g is the g factor (g = 2.00232).

So the above equation can now be expressed as

deltaE = Ub*g*B

Where Ub is the bohr magneton.

But this answer is wrong. It would work out if I didn't use the refined value of g and just used 2.

What am I doing wrong?
Cheers
I am not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean that you would get the correct answer if you used g =2 instead of 2.00232?

If this what you mean than two comments: a) if you work within three sig figs, it does not make any difference and b) most elementary books use g=2, i.e. they neglect vacuum fluctuations effects.

So if this is your only problem, I would say to use g=2 and not worry about the difference of one part in a thousand
 
yeah that was my only problem. I just wasn't sure if the book wants you to use g = 2.00232 or not. But yeah I'll just stick with using 2 then.
Cheers for that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top