What is the entropy of the quantum state vacuum in inflationary theory

Maximise24
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Consider the vacuum state that is hypothesised to precede the moment of inflation in classical inflationary theory.

The theory assumes that quantum fluctuations in this vacuum are magnified because of the process of inflation and have gone on to form the real energy structures that we witness in our present universe.

Obviously, these structures contain information and have therefore a degree of entropy. Since these structures can be ultimately traced back to the vacuum, is it reasonable to assume that the vacuum state must also possesses some kind of entropy?

If so, would one describe this entropy as low (perhaps considering the many quantum fluctuations to be information) or high (maybe since there is no real energy present in the vacuum)? Or can the vacuum be said not to have any entropy at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to this question is not straightforward. It depends on how one defines entropy. Generally speaking, entropy is a measure of disorder or uncertainty in a system. In the context of a vacuum state, it could be argued that there is some degree of entropy present. After all, the vacuum state is characterized by quantum fluctuations, which are unpredictable and random. However, since there is no energy present in the vacuum state, it could also be argued that the entropy is effectively zero. Ultimately, the answer to this question depends on one's definition of entropy and how much weight is given to the presence of quantum fluctuations.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top