What is the entropy of three cue balls in a bucket?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjustinn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the entropy of three cue balls in a cylindrical bucket, focusing on two specific states: one where the balls are at rest and touching each other and the bucket, and another defined by their coordinates and momenta. The entropy is linked to the number of microstates that correspond to each macrostate, with the formula S = k log(W) being referenced. Participants highlight the need for clarity on what constitutes a macrostate in this scenario, as traditional variables like temperature and pressure may not apply. There is a suggestion that the arrangement of the balls and their momenta may not be independent, complicating the analysis. Overall, the conversation seeks to explore the quantitative expression of entropy in this unique physical setup.
jjustinn
Messages
160
Reaction score
3
I posted this question a couple days back, but it got removed because it looked like a homework question (which, I suppose, is flattering, since I came up with it on the way home from work, and I'm not even a student, let alone a teacher)...so I'm going to try to rephrase it -- but because this is the most concise formulation I could think of, here's the original:

Given a cylindrical bucket of radius R, and three identical cue balls of radius r inside of it, what is the entropy of...

(1) ...the state where all three balls are at rest, touching each other, and touching the side of the bucket?

(2) ...the state where the coordinates of the balls are (r1, θ1), (r2, θ2), (r3, θ3) and the momenta are (p1, ω1), (p2, ω2), (p3, ω3) for balls #1, #2, #3, respectively?

Assume the bucket is fixed (immobile) and the balls are constrained to roll along the plane z=0 (they cannot bounce)

I'm not even sure there's enough information there to get the entropy; because, if I understand correctly, the entropy is a measure of the number of "microstates" (in this case, the coordinates/momenta of each ball) that give rise to a given "macrostate"...and I'm not sure what a macrostate would be here: I can't think of any "macro" variables analogous to heat, etc.
The closest I can think of would be that you would get the same "macrostate" by swapping any of the identical balls, or rotating the bucket...

I picked the state in (1) because it seemed like it would be the state with the highest entropy, because intuitively, if you dropped three cueballs in a bucket and rattled it around, eventually the balls would settle down next to each other on the side...but I'm trying to figure out away to express this quantitatively.

So, any guidance, corrections, thoughts, musings, etc would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
S = k log(W), where W is the number of microstates accessible to the system.

For each microstate available the total energy of the system is unchanged. Different microstates are rearrangements of the energy of the system. See:
http://entropysite.oxy.edu/microstate/
 
UltrafastPED said:
S = k log(W), where W is the number of microstates accessible to the system.

For each microstate available the total energy of the system is unchanged. Different microstates are rearrangements of the energy of the system. See:
http://entropysite.oxy.edu/microstate/
In the OP, there are two macrostates. In each, all the microstates have the same energy, so you can compare the entropies of the macrostates.
jjustinn, I think you need to specify more details. The way you describe (1), the three balls only just fit in the bottom of the bucket. That being so, the momenta of the same three balls moving in the bottom of the bucket are not independent.
 
I don't plan to solve his question - instead I provide tools for him to do his own analysis.

Also macrostates, as I understand them, are measured by temperature, pressure, etc. When you have to count things, they are microstates.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top