What is the Estimated Local Star Formation Rate and How Accurate is it?

AI Thread Summary
The estimated local star formation rate (SFR) is roughly 10 stars per year based on a simple calculation dividing the number of stars in the galaxy by its age. However, this estimate does not account for variations in galactic history or local conditions, such as starburst periods or regions like globular clusters and Giant Molecular Clouds. Accurate SFR measurements can be obtained through methods like H-balmer spectra analysis or radio observations of star-forming clouds. The term "OOM" refers to "Order Of Magnitude," indicating a rough estimate within a factor of ten. Understanding the SFR is complex and requires consideration of various astronomical factors.
randa177
Messages
90
Reaction score
1
What is the estimated value of the local star formation rate (SFR) and how accurately do we know this number?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The crudest of estimates divides the number of stars in the galaxy, OOM 1011, by the OOM age of the galaxy, 1010 years, and concludes that roughly on average 10 stars per year are formed in the whole galaxy.

This, of course, does not take into account glactic history, which include star burst eras, or the local conditions, which may vary widely from ancient dust free globular star clusters, where there is virtually no star formation, to Giant Molecular Clouds such as the Orion nebula, where stars are observed today in the process of formation.

Garth
 
what is OOM?
 
Order Of Magnitude - also known as WAG (wild ass guess)

The sun is in a pretty quiet region - star formation is normally associated with hydrogen clouds.
You can estimate SFR from either H-balmer spectra from all the newly ionized hydrogen or from Radio obs of star forming clouds.
 
Last edited:
randa177 said:
what is OOM?
Order Of Magnitude; a crude estimate in the 'ball park' as they say to within a factor of ten.

Garth
Edit: mgb_phys beat me to it!

Garth
 
Thank you very much
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Back
Top