What is the Exact Meaning of F=dp/dt?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of Newton's second law, F=dp/dt, questioning whether it serves as a definition, an empirical finding, or a theoretical derivation. Participants note that force is defined through its measurement by a force meter in an inertial frame, and that the relationship between force and momentum can be circular. It is emphasized that while F=ma is empirical, the second law defines force in relation to the rate of change of momentum. The complexity increases when considering scenarios like rockets, where mass changes during motion. Overall, the conversation highlights the ongoing debate about the foundational understanding of force in Newtonian mechanics.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.

Force was introduced to me as "what a force meter in an inertial frame measures". I'm a bit confused about the interpretation of Newton's second law$$F=\frac{dp}{dt}\enspace.$$
Is it a definition? Is it an empirical finding? Can it be derived theoretically?

Or do we need to make the "definition" "what a force meter in an inertial frame measures" more rigorous? How could we formulate this more mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F=ma, like the concept of frames, is purely empirical from the beginning. Force and momentum are circularly defined.
 
greypilgrim said:
Is it a definition?

It is part of a definition. All three laws of motion together define force.
 
I think the original formula was F=\frac{d}{dt}(mv). As long as the mass is constant, this reduces to F=m\frac{dv}{dt}=m\cdot a. In a rocket, where an appreciable amount of mass is fuel which is used up during the flight, the formula becomes F=m\frac{dv}{dt}+\frac{dm}{dt}v=m\cdot a+\frac{dm}{dt}v.
 
The second law states that the force on a body is proportional to the rate of change of linear momentum. We work in units where the proportionality constant is 1. You could in principle, define force to be that quantity which is say, twice the rate of change of linear momentum. You would ofcourse, accordingly have to change your other definitions such as work done, energy.
 
According to the authors in Knudsen & Hjorth, Elements of Newtonian Mechanics, 3rd ed., section 2.1:

"The whole concept of force has been the subject of much debate since it was introduced by Newton. Let us here note the following: the second law [ref. to eq. for 2nd law] should not be considered as the definition of the concept of force. An essential feature of the law is that the force acting on the particle is supplied by a force law separate from [ref. to eq. for 2nd law]. One example of such a force law is the law of gravity. (...)"
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top