Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of Newton's second law, expressed as $$F=\frac{dp}{dt}$$. Participants explore whether this equation serves as a definition, an empirical finding, or a theoretical derivation, and they consider the implications of defining force in relation to measurements in inertial frames.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question whether $$F=\frac{dp}{dt}$$ is a definition, an empirical finding, or something that can be derived theoretically.
- One participant suggests that force and momentum are circularly defined, implying that their definitions are interdependent.
- Another participant argues that the three laws of motion together define force, indicating a more integrated approach to understanding the concept.
- A participant discusses the original formulation of the second law as $$F=\frac{d}{dt}(mv)$$, noting that it changes when mass is not constant, as in the case of a rocket.
- It is mentioned that the second law states force is proportional to the rate of change of momentum, with the possibility of redefining force based on different proportionality constants.
- A reference is made to Knudsen & Hjorth's work, which states that the second law should not be considered a definition of force, emphasizing the need for a separate force law.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on whether the second law serves as a definition of force, with no consensus reached on its interpretation or implications.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the potential circularity in the definitions of force and momentum, and the discussion includes various interpretations of the second law without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions involved.