What is the Expanded Formula for a Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Square
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)]
the book expands it to:
(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2

i didnt get it so can someone please help me in this, i think there is a mistake in the book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)]
the book expands it to:
(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)] does not equal to(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2

However,
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)] = (x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2
 


Originally posted by KL Kam
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)] does not equal to(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2

However,
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)] = (x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2
have you noticed the experssions on the right are the same?
 
Last edited:
Please read the expressions on the left hand sides carefully. I changed a "+" sign to a "-" sign in the third small bracket
 
yes you are right. i guess it was a type mistake )-:
 
With the negative, it is simply the formula for a square:

(a+b)*(a+b)= a2+ 2ab+ b2

with a= x3-x2 and b= x2- x1
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top