What Is the Expert Golfer's Ideal Single Stroke on the Green?

  • Thread starter Thread starter niyati
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Green
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ideal single stroke for an expert golfer on the green, given a novice's three strokes totaling specific displacements. The novice's movements include 4.00 m north, 2.00 m northeast (assumed to be at a 45-degree angle), and 1.00 m at 30 degrees west of south. Participants confirm that the resultant vector is derived by breaking down each displacement into its components and summing them. The angles for the second and third vectors are clarified, with northeast equating to 45 degrees and the third vector at 240 degrees. The final consensus is that adding the components will yield the expert golfer's optimal single displacement.
niyati
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
A novice golfer on the green takes three strokes to sink the ball. The successive displacements are 4.00 m to the north, 2.00 m northeast, and 1.00 m at 30.0 degrees west of south. Starting at the same initial point, an expert golfer could make the hole in what single displacement?

I drew the picture, but am I to assume northeast means a 45 degree angle? The resultant vector is the sum of all three of these vectors. The first vector, broken down to its components, is 0i + 4j, or [0,4]. The second vector (if I'm assuming it has an angle of 45 degrees) has components of 2.00cos45 and 2.00 sin45, which makes 2/[sq.rt.]2 for both the x and y coordinates. And the third vector must be at an angle of 240 degrees, if it is just 30 degrees off of south in a western direction. Therefore, it is -120 or 240 degrees: h.c. = 1.00cos240 and v.c. = 1.00sin240. If these are all correct, I am just suppose to add each component to its respective component in order to get the resultant components of the expert golfer's shot, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, looks right to me. I agree, northeast seems to imply 45 degrees.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top