What is the explanation behind Newton's Laws?

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Laws of Motion are fundamental principles in physics, with the first law addressing inertia, stating that an object remains in motion unless acted upon by an external force. The second law, which is often emphasized, relates force, mass, and acceleration through the equation F=ma. The third law highlights action and reaction, illustrated by rocket propulsion, where expelling gas results in forward motion. Despite some claims that the first and third laws are less important, they are crucial for understanding various physical phenomena, including planetary motion and everyday experiences. Overall, all three laws are essential for a comprehensive understanding of motion and forces.
._|evo|_.
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need someone to help me fully understand Newton's Laws. I kinda get his second law, the sum of the forces equals mass times acceleration??, but yea.

Homework Equations



Newton's First Law
Newton's Second Law [URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/9/9/199b3ff9558f5b5e1286d77f1b3b1c44.png[/URL]
Newton's Third Law

The Attempt at a Solution


Uh...I checked with my teacher, no result.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well what about the laws is it that you do not understand?
 
Like how you can apply them to stuff. I just need someone to recap in simple words, I'm not really good at big fat definitions.

I'm also asking cause my teacher keeps on emphasizing that Newton's laws 1 & 3 are pretty much useless, and only 2 is important.
 
._|evo|_. said:
Like how you can apply them to stuff. I just need someone to recap in simple words, I'm not really good at big fat definitions.

I'm also asking cause my teacher keeps on emphasizing that Newton's laws 1 & 3 are pretty much useless, and only 2 is important.

The third law is used in principle as an application to rockets in space.

The fuel is burnt and gas is expelled, which exerts an equal and opposite reaction on the rocket causing it to move forward.

I believe the only reason your teacher thinks they are useless is because Newtons 2nd Law can be expressed in a formula.
 
your teacher says that the first and third of Newton's laws of motion are useless?! that is nonsense.

his first law describes inertia, that a body in motion stays in motion unless acted on by another force. that's a pretty important concept. it explains why planets basically orbit each other and TONS of other important things. not quite useless in my book.

and the third law, as mentioned above, can be applied to how rockets in space work.

i think you might be thinking of application in the wrong sense. just because something can't be applied mathematically doesn't mean it can't be applied.
 
Whitishcube said:
his first law describes inertia, that a body in motion stays in motion unless acted on by another force. that's a pretty important concept. it explains why planets basically orbit each other and TONS of other important things. not quite useless in my book.

Newton's 1st Law taught me that I should hold onto something when a bus starts moving and when it s going to stop. Else, I'd fall down!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top