What is the film coefficient for a hot object moving through open air?

AI Thread Summary
Estimating the heat transfer coefficient for a hot object moving through open air involves modeling the situation as Newtonian cooling, focusing on convection rather than conduction. The relevant scenario is turbulent flow of a cold gas over a "warm wall," where the coefficient is derived from the Reynolds number. Key parameters include thermal conductivity, length of the object, kinematic viscosity, and velocity. Several questions arise regarding the definitions of terms like "warm wall," the dimensions used for calculations, and the relevance of the object's shape. Clarifying these points is essential for accurate heat transfer modeling in this context.
vhf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to estimate the heat transfer coefficient from the surface of a hot object moving through open air. After much searching, all I can find is coefficients for sundry fluids confined within the tubes of heat exchangers.

I'm trying to calculate for a body at between 300-460K moving at up to 35m/s through air at about 300K.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
I'd want to model that as Newtonian cooling since the air is moving over the body fast enough to carry the heat away. Objects in air lose heat mostly by convection. You seem to have been looking at heat transfer by conduction.
 
I'm well aware that the problem is one of convection not conduction as are the references on heat exchangers I've been reading.

Out of 60 or so scenarios that are listed, the one that seems to be of closest relevance is turbulent flow of a cold gas over a "warm wall". In this case the Prandtl and Grashof numbers can be disregarded and the coefficient is a function of the Reynolds number:-

P= 0.055k/l R^0.75 (Imperial Units) and R= vL/n where

k= thermal conductivity
l= length of pipe
n= kinematic viscosity
v= velocity
L: "for lengths greater than 2 feet use L=2"


This begs a whole host of questions:-

What exactly does a "warm wall" consist of?
Should I read "length of wall" for length of pipe?
Why are we dividing by l when the transmitted power is already per unit of surface area anyway?
What is the relevant dimension for irregular objects?
Is l the same as L, and if not is "lengths greater than 2 feet" referring to l or L?
Why is R apparently being calculated from a longitudinal rather than a lateral dimension?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top