What is the final percentage for the module?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamus1985
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the final percentage for the module, the weighted average formula is used, where assignment scores are multiplied by their respective weightings. Jamie scored 56% on Assignment 1, which counts for 40% of the module, and 62% on Assignment 2, which counts for 60%. The calculation is performed as follows: (0.40 * 56) + (0.60 * 62) = 22.4 + 37.2, resulting in a final percentage of 59.6%. This method ensures that the contributions of each assignment to the overall grade are accurately reflected. The final percentage for the module is 59.6%.
Jamus1985
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi I am trying to calculate a result for a module I took

I got 56 % for assignment 1
I got 62% for assignment 2

Assignment 1 counts as 40% of the module
Assignment 2 counts as 60% of the module

Can anyone tell me what my final percentage is for the module please

Thanks a lot

cheers

Jamie
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Generally, if mark a counts for x percent, and b counts for y percent, then the overall score will be (ax+by)/100. Plug in your values and you will get your average (59.6)
 
Sorry could you just clarify what you mean by (ax+by)/100.. Sorry having a dumb day

cheers
 
You want to find the weighted mean.

You got 56 in Ass. 1 which is worth 40%.
You got 62 in Ass. 2 which is worth 60%.

56(40) + 62(60)
---------------
40 + 60

is your weighted mean, 59.6.
 
Jamus1985 said:
Hi I am trying to calculate a result for a module I took...
Jamie

Wow, I really hope it wasn't a module in mathematics. :-p
 
Here's how I think of it:

40% of Assignment1 + 60% of Assignment2 = 100% of your grade

0.40(56) + 0.6(62) = 22.4 + 37.2 = 59.6

100% of 59.6 is 59.6.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top