What is the final pressure inside the thermos after dropping in a piece of iron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spherical23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
spherical23
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A well insulated 2 liter thermos bottle contains 500 ml of boiling liquid Nitrogen, and the remainder of the thermos has Nitrogen gas at 1 atmosphere in equilibrium with the liquid. You drop a 200 gram piece of iron at 25 degrees Celsius inside and seal the cap. After 5 seconds, what is the pressure inside the thermos?

Homework Equations



\rho liquid nitrogen = 810 kg/m3

\rho iron = 7.87 g/cm3

PV = NkT

I think that I need more equations to solve the problem, but I don't know what they are.

The Attempt at a Solution



V total = 2 L = 0.002 m3

V liquid nitrogen = 500 ml = 500 * 10-3 L = 0.5 L = 0.0005 m3

before dropping the iron in: V nitrogen gas = 0.002 m3 - 0.0005 m3 = 0.0015 m3

V iron: \rho = mV \rightarrow 7.87 g/cm3 = 200g(V) \rightarrow V = 0.03935 cm3 = 0.0003935 m3

after dropping the iron in: V nitrogen gas = 0.0015 m3 - 0.0003935 m3 = 0.0011065 m3

Tinitial of liquid nitrogen = boiling point at 1 atm = 77.2 K

Tinitial of iron = 25 degrees Celsius = 298 K

Pinitial of liquid nitrogen = Pinitial of nitrogen gas = 1 atm = 0.013 * 105 Pa

\Deltat = 5 seconds

Pfinal = ?

I just don't know which equation to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to work out how much heat energy the iron gives up when cooled (assume final T of iron = LN2)
Assume this energy goes into boiling extra LN2.
Work out how much extra N2 this generates.
Then it's just gas laws for the pressure.

The 5 seconds is tricky, are you sure about that part? Unless you are expected to calcualte heat diffusion rate from the iron it's irrelevant.
 
thanks, i will give that a try and then reply again when i come up with something. i think the 5 seconds is just enough for relaxation time so that we don't have to worry about anything during the relaxation time.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top