What is the final velocity of a watercraft with 2-dimensional acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
To find the final velocity of a watercraft with an initial velocity of 6.4 m/s [E] and an average acceleration of 2.0 m/s² [S] over 2.5 seconds, the appropriate equation is Vf = Vi + aav(t). The southward acceleration affects only the southward component of velocity, while the eastward component remains unchanged. By calculating the southward velocity using V = a*t, the final velocities can be combined as vectors using the Pythagorean theorem. This method provides a clear solution to the problem. Understanding vector addition is crucial for solving two-dimensional motion problems effectively.
chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A watercraft with an initial velocity of 6.4 m/s [E] undergoes an average acceleration of 2.0 m/s^2 for 2.5 s. What is the final velocity of the watercraft

The Attempt at a Solution



i'm lost :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chris097 said:

Homework Statement



A watercraft with an initial velocity of 6.4 m/s [E] undergoes an average acceleration of 2.0 m/s^2 for 2.5 s. What is the final velocity of the watercraft

The Attempt at a Solution



i'm lost :(


Welcome to PF.

What equations do you know that would relate velocities and acceleration and time?
 
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

What equations do you know that would relate velocities and acceleration and time?

Vf = Vi + aav(t)

and thank you for the welcome :)
 
That equation doesn't work. It's 2 dimensional. South acceleration with an Eastern intial velocity. I've been on that question for way too long. Please help.
 
Starting from rest then what will the {S} component of velocity be after 2.5 s?

The V = a*t cited would work just fine.

Armed with the {S} velocity and knowing that the {E} velocity is unchanged, then simply add the velocities as vectors. Let Pythagoras be your guide.
 
oh my... thanks a lot. i'll be able to sleep tonight now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top