What Is the Flaw in These Probability Calculations for Coin Tosses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fraggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
fraggle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
A coin is tossed 3 times. at least 1 head is obtained. Determine each probability...?

1) exactly 1 head is obtained
2) exactly 2 heads are obtained
3) exactly 3 heads are obtained.
------------------------------------------------------------

for 1) brute force indicates that there 7 possible combinations:

HHH, HHT, HTH, HTT, THH, THT, TTH (because at least one heads is obtained).

Out of these we see that there are 3 occasions where there is exactly one heads.
If we let S be the sample space of all possable outcomes, and let E be the event of having exactly one heads, then a basic rule of probability indicates that the probability P(E)=|E|/|S|=3/7.

However, using another method:
fix one coin throw's result as heads. Then the probability of the other two throws being tails is (1/2)(1/2)=1/4.
Since we can fix heads 3 times, this indicates that the probability is 3(1/4)=3/4.

Can anyone spot where the flaw is in either of these attempts at a solution?
thanks
(this isn't a homework question btw)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3/7 is a conditional probability given at least one head. For the unconditional probability you need to count TTT among the outcomes.

3/4 is the conditional probability of two tails given (one) head. "Head" has probability 1/2, so the unconditional probability is 3/4 x 1/2 = 3/8.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top